PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSB.TO vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XSB.TO vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Core Canadian Short Term Bond Index ETF (XSB.TO) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XSB.TO is traded in CAD, while QQQ is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the QQQ values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSB.TO achieves a 1.18% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 19.95% return. Over the past 10 years, XSB.TO has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 1.97%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 22.83% annualized return.


XSB.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
0.82%
YTD
1.18%
6M
1.40%
1Y
3.30%
3Y*
4.97%
5Y*
2.05%
10Y*
1.97%

QQQ

1D
0.77%
1M
2.17%
YTD
19.95%
6M
19.54%
1Y
41.35%
3Y*
28.32%
5Y*
20.27%
10Y*
22.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSB.TO vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XSB.TO
iShares Core Canadian Short Term Bond Index ETF
1.18%3.70%5.87%4.67%-4.04%-1.11%5.20%3.20%1.60%0.13%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
19.95%15.26%36.21%51.17%-28.30%27.36%45.10%33.23%8.27%23.68%

Correlation

The correlation between XSB.TO and QQQ is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2006

-0.07

The correlation between XSB.TO and QQQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (all time) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XSB.TO vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSB.TO
XSB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
XSB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
XSB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSB.TO vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Canadian Short Term Bond Index ETF (XSB.TO) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XSB.TOQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.39

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.20

3.20

-1.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.28

10.39

-3.10

XSB.TO vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSB.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is comparable to the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSB.TO and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XSB.TO vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSB.TO drawdown since its inception was -8.65%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -37.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSB.TO and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XSB.TOQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.65%

-37.57%

+28.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.47%

-12.21%

+10.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.47%

-22.62%

+21.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.99%

-32.34%

+25.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-8.65%

-32.34%

+23.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.40%

+2.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.79%

-6.68%

+5.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.44%

3.76%

-3.32%

Volatility

XSB.TO vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core Canadian Short Term Bond Index ETF (XSB.TO) is 0.71%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 7.63%. This indicates that XSB.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XSB.TOQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.71%

7.63%

-6.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.61%

14.07%

-12.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.00%

17.40%

-15.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.72%

23.32%

-20.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.40%

23.34%

-19.94%

XSB.TO vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSB.TO has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XSB.TO vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

XSB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.10%, more than QQQ's 0.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.39%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%
XSB.TO
iShares Core Canadian Short Term Bond Index ETF
3.10%3.15%3.05%2.67%2.28%2.05%2.21%2.39%2.39%2.36%2.36%2.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


XSB.TO and QQQ have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XSB.TO is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XSB.TO is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for QQQ.

XSB.TO is categorized as Canadian Government Bonds, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. XSB.TO tracks Morningstar Can 1-5Y Core Bd GR CAD, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for XSB.TO and 0.18% for QQQ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSB.TO and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer