XRT vs. RSPD

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

XRT (SPDR S&P Retail ETF) and RSPD (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds - XRT tracks the S&P Retail Select Industry Index while RSPD tracks the S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Discretionary -SEC. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XRT returned 9.00%/yr vs 8.14%/yr for RSPD. Their correlation of 0.83 means they have usually moved in the same direction. XRT charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for RSPD.

Performance

XRT vs. RSPD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF (RSPD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XRT achieves a 7.76% return, which is significantly higher than RSPD's 1.19% return. Over the past 10 years, XRT has outperformed RSPD with an annualized return of 9.00%, while RSPD has yielded a comparatively lower 8.14% annualized return.

XRT

• 1D: 1.87%
• 1M: 3.86%
• 6M: 4.50%
• YTD: 7.76%
• 1Y: 18.43%
• 3Y*: 12.43%
• 5Y*: 1.12%
• 10Y*: 9.00%
• ALL TIME*: 9.68%

RSPD

• 1D: 1.06%
• 1M: 1.79%
• 6M: -2.22%
• YTD: 1.19%
• 1Y: 6.06%
• 3Y*: 8.79%
• 5Y*: 4.22%
• 10Y*: 8.14%
• ALL TIME*: 8.32%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
RSPD Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF	$3.23M	$2.98M	$3.50M
XRT SPDR S&P Retail ETF	$433.01M	$377.95M	$454.29M

XRT vs. RSPD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XRT SPDR S&P Retail ETF	7.76%	8.07%	11.78%	21.53%	-31.64%	42.60%	41.91%	14.12%	-8.04%	4.22%
RSPD Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF	1.19%	7.98%	13.37%	22.55%	-24.03%	28.75%	11.43%	25.88%	-8.79%	15.04%

Correlation

The correlation between XRT and RSPD is 0.83, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.83
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.84
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.87
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2006	0.83

The correlation between XRT and RSPD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

XRT vs. RSPD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XRT	RSPD
Consumer Cyclical	75.2%	93.6%
Consumer Defensive	18.7%	-
Technology	2.7%	2.2%
Communication Services	1.8%	2.4%
Healthcare	1.6%	-
Energy	1.3%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Financial Services	-	0.1%
Industrials	-	1.8%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

XRT vs. RSPD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XRT

XRT Risk / Return Rank: 35
XRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
XRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
XRT Omega Ratio Rank: 33
XRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
XRT Martin Ratio Rank: 33

RSPD

RSPD Risk / Return Rank: 18
RSPD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
RSPD Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
RSPD Omega Ratio Rank: 17
RSPD Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
RSPD Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XRT vs. RSPD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF (RSPD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XRT	RSPD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.89	0.32	+0.56
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.43	0.64	+0.79
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.07	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.37	0.44	+0.93
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.09	0.99	+2.10

XRT vs. RSPD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XRT Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is higher than the RSPD Sharpe Ratio of 0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XRT and RSPD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XRT vs. RSPD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XRT drawdown since its inception was -65.81%, roughly equal to the maximum RSPD drawdown of -68.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRT and RSPD.

Drawdown Indicators

	XRT	RSPD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.81%	-68.00%	+2.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.53%	-13.80%	+0.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.62%	-21.01%	-4.61%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-44.57%	-34.41%	-10.16%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.02%	-48.00%	+0.98%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.26%	-3.85%	-1.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.95%	-10.67%	-4.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.97%	6.14%	-0.17%

Volatility

XRT vs. RSPD - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF (RSPD) have volatilities of 6.29% and 6.00%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XRT	RSPD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.29%	6.00%	+0.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.03%	14.62%	+0.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.91%	18.82%	+2.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.91%	22.19%	+4.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.20%	23.13%	+4.07%

XRT vs. RSPD - Expense Ratio Comparison

XRT has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than RSPD's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

XRT vs. RSPD - Dividend Comparison

XRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, less than RSPD's 0.86% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RSPD Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF	0.86%	1.08%	0.84%	1.09%	0.99%	0.53%	0.81%	1.59%	1.67%	1.45%	1.27%	1.37%
XRT SPDR S&P Retail ETF	0.74%	0.77%	1.52%	1.40%	2.15%	1.55%	1.01%	1.57%	1.51%	1.52%	1.36%	1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XRT and RSPD in my portfolio?

XRT and RSPD have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XRT or RSPD?

XRT has higher volatility (6.29%) compared to RSPD (6.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XRT dropped -65.81% vs RSPD's -68.00%.

Which ETF is better, XRT or RSPD?

On 10-year performance, XRT leads with 9.00% vs 8.14% for RSPD. On fees, XRT is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, RSPD has been the lower-risk option at 6.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XRT or RSPD?

Over the 10-year period, XRT has performed better with a 9.00% return vs 8.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XRT or RSPD?

XRT is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XRT or RSPD?

RSPD has the higher dividend yield at 0.86%, compared with 0.74% for XRT.

What is the main difference between XRT and RSPD?

XRT tracks S&P Retail Select Industry Index, while RSPD tracks S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Discretionary -SEC. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XRT and 0.40% for RSPD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.89 vs 0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.