XRT vs. GXPD
XRT (SPDR S&P Retail ETF) and GXPD (Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds - XRT tracks the S&P Retail Select Industry while GXPD tracks the MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary PureCap Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XRT charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for GXPD.
Performance
XRT vs. GXPD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XRT achieves a -1.99% return, which is significantly lower than GXPD's -0.87% return.
XRT
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- -0.29%
- YTD
- -1.99%
- 6M
- -2.00%
- 1Y
- 8.44%
- 3Y*
- 13.38%
- 5Y*
- -0.84%
- 10Y*
- 8.56%
GXPD
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- -2.13%
- YTD
- -0.87%
- 6M
- -0.98%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XRT vs. GXPD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XRT SPDR S&P Retail ETF | -1.99% | 3.21% |
GXPD Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF | -0.87% | 5.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between XRT and GXPD is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025 | 0.58 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XRT vs. GXPD — Risk / Return Rank
XRT
GXPD
XRT vs. GXPD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT) and Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF (GXPD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XRT | GXPD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.63 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.45 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XRT | GXPD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.26 | +0.08 |
Drawdowns
XRT vs. GXPD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XRT drawdown since its inception was -65.81%, which is greater than GXPD's maximum drawdown of -16.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRT and GXPD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XRT | GXPD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.81% | -16.61% | -49.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.53% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.62% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.57% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.02% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.82% | -5.48% | -8.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.00% | -4.27% | -10.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.85% | — | — |
Volatility
XRT vs. GXPD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XRT | GXPD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.50% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.63% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.42% | 20.01% | +0.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.90% | 20.01% | +6.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.16% | 20.01% | +7.15% |
XRT vs. GXPD - Expense Ratio Comparison
XRT has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than GXPD's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
XRT vs. GXPD - Dividend Comparison
XRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, more than GXPD's 0.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXPD Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF | 0.19% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XRT SPDR S&P Retail ETF | 0.83% | 0.77% | 1.52% | 1.40% | 2.15% | 1.55% | 1.01% | 1.57% | 1.51% | 1.52% | 1.36% | 1.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XRT and GXPD have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GXPD is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXPD is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XRT.
XRT has the higher dividend yield at 0.83%, compared with 0.19% for GXPD.
XRT tracks S&P Retail Select Industry, while GXPD tracks MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary PureCap Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XRT and 0.15% for GXPD.
Find the right allocation for XRT and GXPD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer