XRSG.L vs. LYPG.DE
XRSG.L (Xtrackers Russell 2000 UCITS ETF 1C) and LYPG.DE (Amundi MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF EUR Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - XRSG.L is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 TR USD, while LYPG.DE is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Information Technology. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XRSG.L returned 10.00%/yr vs 22.50%/yr for LYPG.DE. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.30% expense ratio.
Performance
XRSG.L vs. LYPG.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XRSG.L is traded in GBp, while LYPG.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the LYPG.DE values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XRSG.L achieves a 19.15% return, which is significantly higher than LYPG.DE's 16.21% return. Over the past 10 years, XRSG.L has underperformed LYPG.DE with an annualized return of 10.00%, while LYPG.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 22.50% annualized return.
XRSG.L
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -2.05%
- 6M
- 12.42%
- YTD
- 19.15%
- 1Y
- 32.92%
- 3Y*
- 13.88%
- 5Y*
- 7.27%
- 10Y*
- 10.00%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.24%
LYPG.DE
- 1D
- 1.17%
- 1M
- -6.09%
- 6M
- 18.75%
- YTD
- 16.21%
- 1Y
- 29.00%
- 3Y*
- 25.39%
- 5Y*
- 18.12%
- 10Y*
- 22.50%
- ALL TIME*
- 20.38%
XRSG.L vs. LYPG.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XRSG.L Xtrackers Russell 2000 UCITS ETF 1C | 19.15% | 4.65% | 11.80% | 12.16% | -11.47% | 15.43% | 15.81% | 20.64% | -7.63% | 4.40% |
LYPG.DE Amundi MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF EUR Acc | 16.21% | 14.88% | 34.88% | 46.22% | -24.39% | 31.72% | 38.04% | 43.33% | 2.03% | 25.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between XRSG.L and LYPG.DE is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2015 | 0.62 |
The correlation between XRSG.L and LYPG.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (3 years) to 0.62 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XRSG.L vs. LYPG.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XRSG.L
LYPG.DE
XRSG.L vs. LYPG.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Russell 2000 UCITS ETF 1C (XRSG.L) and Amundi MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYPG.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XRSG.L | LYPG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.23 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.81 | 1.76 | +2.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.93 | 4.27 | +6.66 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XRSG.L vs. LYPG.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XRSG.L drawdown since its inception was -48.07%, which is greater than LYPG.DE's maximum drawdown of -28.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRSG.L and LYPG.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XRSG.L | LYPG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.07% | -28.29% | -19.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.61% | -16.37% | +7.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.09% | -28.29% | -1.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.09% | -28.29% | -1.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.31% | -28.29% | -7.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.83% | -8.65% | +4.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.78% | -5.12% | -8.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.00% | 6.78% | -3.78% |
Volatility
XRSG.L vs. LYPG.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers Russell 2000 UCITS ETF 1C (XRSG.L) is 4.40%, while Amundi MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYPG.DE) has a volatility of 7.49%. This indicates that XRSG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LYPG.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XRSG.L | LYPG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.40% | 7.49% | -3.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.15% | 16.67% | -4.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.84% | 21.69% | -4.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.62% | 22.42% | +1.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.54% | 21.35% | +1.19% |
XRSG.L vs. LYPG.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XRSG.L and LYPG.DE have an expense ratio of 0.30%.
Dividends
XRSG.L vs. LYPG.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XRSG.L nor LYPG.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XRSG.L and LYPG.DE have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.30% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XRSG.L and LYPG.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.30% per year.
XRSG.L is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while LYPG.DE is Technology Equities. XRSG.L tracks Russell 2000 TR USD, while LYPG.DE tracks MSCI World Information Technology. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi.
Find the right allocation for XRSG.L and LYPG.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer