LYPG.DE vs. HMCA.L

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Amundi MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYPG.DE) and HSBC MSCI CHINA A UCITS ETF (HMCA.L).

LYPG.DE and HMCA.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LYPG.DE is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI World Information Technology. It was launched on Aug 16, 2010. HMCA.L is a passively managed fund by HSBC that tracks the performance of the MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY. It was launched on Jul 27, 2018. Both LYPG.DE and HMCA.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

LYPG.DE vs. HMCA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYPG.DE) and HSBC MSCI CHINA A UCITS ETF (HMCA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

LYPG.DE vs. HMCA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
LYPG.DE Amundi MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF EUR Acc	-6.86%	9.20%	41.03%	49.19%	-28.32%	41.72%	30.66%	51.20%	-13.85%
HMCA.L HSBC MSCI CHINA A UCITS ETF	0.76%	11.25%	18.95%	-16.85%	-21.39%	10.95%	31.51%	38.46%	-13.10%

Different Trading Currencies

LYPG.DE is traded in EUR, while HMCA.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the HMCA.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LYPG.DE achieves a -6.86% return, which is significantly lower than HMCA.L's 0.76% return.

LYPG.DE

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: -1.51%
• YTD: -6.86%
• 6M: -6.39%
• 1Y: 19.71%
• 3Y*: 21.70%
• 5Y*: 15.16%
• 10Y*: 20.12%

HMCA.L

• 1D: 0.74%
• 1M: -1.60%
• YTD: 0.76%
• 6M: 1.41%
• 1Y: 17.15%
• 3Y*: 2.54%
• 5Y*: -0.92%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LYPG.DE vs. HMCA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both LYPG.DE and HMCA.L have an expense ratio of 0.30%.

LYPG.DE

Amundi MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF EUR Acc

HMCA.L

HSBC MSCI CHINA A UCITS ETF

Return for Risk

LYPG.DE vs. HMCA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LYPG.DE

LYPG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 45
LYPG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
LYPG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
LYPG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 37
LYPG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
LYPG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 45

HMCA.L

HMCA.L Risk / Return Rank: 74
HMCA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
HMCA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
HMCA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 65
HMCA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
HMCA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LYPG.DE vs. HMCA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYPG.DE) and HSBC MSCI CHINA A UCITS ETF (HMCA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LYPG.DE	HMCA.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.79	1.00	-0.21
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.22	1.37	-0.16
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.19	-0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.88	2.02	-0.13
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.12	5.73	-0.61
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LYPG.DE vs. HMCA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LYPG.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is comparable to the HMCA.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LYPG.DE and HMCA.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LYPG.DE	HMCA.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79	1.00	-0.21
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67	-0.04	+0.71
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.94	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.92	0.24	+0.68

Correlation

The correlation between LYPG.DE and HMCA.L is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

LYPG.DE vs. HMCA.L - Dividend Comparison

LYPG.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HMCA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
LYPG.DE Amundi MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF EUR Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HMCA.L HSBC MSCI CHINA A UCITS ETF	1.85%	1.76%	1.97%	2.20%	1.76%	1.09%	0.88%	1.78%	0.29%

Drawdowns

LYPG.DE vs. HMCA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LYPG.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.83%, smaller than the maximum HMCA.L drawdown of -43.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYPG.DE and HMCA.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	LYPG.DE	HMCA.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.83%	-44.23%	+12.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.58%	-9.21%	-6.37%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.64%	-41.62%	+11.98%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.83%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.53%	-16.96%	+4.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.72%	-18.09%	+12.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.73%	2.72%	+3.01%

Volatility

LYPG.DE vs. HMCA.L - Volatility Comparison

Amundi MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYPG.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.58% compared to HSBC MSCI CHINA A UCITS ETF (HMCA.L) at 4.83%. This indicates that LYPG.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HMCA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LYPG.DE	HMCA.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.58%	4.83%	+0.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.27%	11.15%	+4.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.91%	16.94%	+7.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.37%	21.53%	+0.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.34%	23.31%	-1.97%