XRSG.L vs. CSH2.L
XRSG.L (Xtrackers Russell 2000 UCITS ETF 1C) and CSH2.L (Amundi Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - XRSG.L is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 TR USD, while CSH2.L is a Money Market fund tracking the SONIA Compounded (GBP Hedged). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XRSG.L returned 10.00%/yr vs 2.12%/yr for CSH2.L. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. XRSG.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for CSH2.L.
Performance
XRSG.L vs. CSH2.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XRSG.L achieves a 19.15% return, which is significantly higher than CSH2.L's 2.24% return. Over the past 10 years, XRSG.L has outperformed CSH2.L with an annualized return of 10.00%, while CSH2.L has yielded a comparatively lower 2.12% annualized return.
XRSG.L
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -2.05%
- 6M
- 12.42%
- YTD
- 19.15%
- 1Y
- 32.92%
- 3Y*
- 13.88%
- 5Y*
- 7.27%
- 10Y*
- 10.00%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.24%
CSH2.L
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- 6M
- 2.07%
- YTD
- 2.24%
- 1Y
- 4.32%
- 3Y*
- 4.95%
- 5Y*
- 3.76%
- 10Y*
- 2.12%
- ALL TIME*
- 1.98%
XRSG.L vs. CSH2.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XRSG.L Xtrackers Russell 2000 UCITS ETF 1C | 19.15% | 4.65% | 11.80% | 12.16% | -11.47% | 15.43% | 15.81% | 20.64% | -7.63% | 4.40% |
CSH2.L Amundi Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc | 2.24% | 4.67% | 5.61% | 4.72% | 1.54% | 0.13% | 0.30% | 0.82% | 0.70% | 0.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between XRSG.L and CSH2.L is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2015 | -0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XRSG.L vs. CSH2.L — Risk / Return Rank
XRSG.L
CSH2.L
XRSG.L vs. CSH2.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Russell 2000 UCITS ETF 1C (XRSG.L) and Amundi Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc (CSH2.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XRSG.L | CSH2.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -6.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -13.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 5.37 | -4.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.81 | 27.30 | -23.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.93 | 174.87 | -163.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XRSG.L vs. CSH2.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XRSG.L drawdown since its inception was -48.07%, which is greater than CSH2.L's maximum drawdown of -0.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRSG.L and CSH2.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XRSG.L | CSH2.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.07% | -0.37% | -47.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.61% | -0.16% | -8.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.09% | -0.29% | -29.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.09% | -0.29% | -29.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.31% | -0.37% | -34.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.83% | 0.00% | -3.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.78% | -0.00% | -13.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.00% | 0.02% | +2.98% |
Volatility
XRSG.L vs. CSH2.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Russell 2000 UCITS ETF 1C (XRSG.L) has a higher volatility of 4.40% compared to Amundi Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc (CSH2.L) at 0.05%. This indicates that XRSG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSH2.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XRSG.L | CSH2.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.40% | 0.05% | +4.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.15% | 0.19% | +11.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.84% | 0.49% | +16.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.62% | 0.56% | +23.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.54% | 0.44% | +22.10% |
XRSG.L vs. CSH2.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XRSG.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than CSH2.L's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
XRSG.L vs. CSH2.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XRSG.L nor CSH2.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XRSG.L and CSH2.L have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSH2.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSH2.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for XRSG.L.
XRSG.L is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while CSH2.L is Money Market. XRSG.L tracks Russell 2000 TR USD, while CSH2.L tracks SONIA Compounded (GBP Hedged). They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for XRSG.L and 0.10% for CSH2.L.
Find the right allocation for XRSG.L and CSH2.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer