CSH2.L vs. TI5G.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Lyxor Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF C-GBP (CSH2.L) and iShares $ TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (TI5G.L).
CSH2.L and TI5G.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CSH2.L is an actively managed fund by Amundi. It was launched on Mar 2, 2015. TI5G.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index 0-5. It was launched on Mar 5, 2018.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CSH2.L or TI5G.L.
Key characteristics
| CSH2.L | TI5G.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 4.82% | 4.22% |
| 1Y Return | 5.51% | 5.57% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 3.70% | 1.28% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 2.31% | 2.75% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 6.01 | 2.29 |
| Sortino Ratio | 9.55 | 3.73 |
| Omega Ratio | 3.49 | 1.50 |
| Calmar Ratio | 18.98 | 2.06 |
| Martin Ratio | 128.17 | 18.98 |
| Ulcer Index | 0.04% | 0.30% |
| Daily Std Dev | 0.91% | 2.52% |
| Max Drawdown | -0.37% | -5.63% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.02% | -0.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSH2.L and TI5G.L is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
CSH2.L vs. TI5G.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, CSH2.L achieves a 4.82% return, which is significantly higher than TI5G.L's 4.22% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CSH2.L vs. TI5G.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSH2.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than TI5G.L's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CSH2.L vs. TI5G.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF C-GBP (CSH2.L) and iShares $ TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (TI5G.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CSH2.L vs. TI5G.L - Dividend Comparison
CSH2.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TI5G.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.70%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSH2.L Lyxor Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF C-GBP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TI5G.L iShares $ TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) | 7.70% | 5.19% | 31.51% | 34.35% | 3.06% | 3.28% | 70.29% |
Drawdowns
CSH2.L vs. TI5G.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSH2.L drawdown since its inception was -0.37%, smaller than the maximum TI5G.L drawdown of -5.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSH2.L and TI5G.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CSH2.L vs. TI5G.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lyxor Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF C-GBP (CSH2.L) is 2.47%, while iShares $ TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (TI5G.L) has a volatility of 2.73%. This indicates that CSH2.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TI5G.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.