XRPZ vs. QSOL
XRPZ (Franklin XRP ETF) and QSOL (Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XRPZ is a Blockchain fund tracking the CME CF XRP-Dollar Reference Rate - New York Variant, while QSOL is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Lukka Prime Solana Reference Rate - Benchmark Price Return. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.88 means they have usually moved in the same direction. XRPZ charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for QSOL.
Performance
XRPZ vs. QSOL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XRPZ having a -41.64% return and QSOL slightly higher at -40.64%.
XRPZ
- 1D
- 1.04%
- 1M
- -0.34%
- 6M
- -44.24%
- YTD
- -41.64%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
QSOL
- 1D
- -2.14%
- 1M
- -4.33%
- 6M
- -41.40%
- YTD
- -40.64%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $121.85K | $81.82K | $102.79K | |
XRPZ Franklin XRP ETF | $2.62M | $2.73M | $3.51M |
XRPZ vs. QSOL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XRPZ Franklin XRP ETF | -41.64% | -8.75% |
QSOL Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF | -40.64% | -4.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between XRPZ and QSOL is 0.88, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2025 | 0.88 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XRPZ vs. QSOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin XRP ETF (XRPZ) and Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF (QSOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XRPZ vs. QSOL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XRPZ drawdown since its inception was -55.39%, roughly equal to the maximum QSOL drawdown of -56.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRPZ and QSOL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XRPZ | QSOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.39% | -56.55% | +1.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -53.80% | -50.10% | -3.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.90% | -36.18% | +1.28% |
Volatility
XRPZ vs. QSOL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XRPZ | QSOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 69.70% | 69.89% | -0.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 69.70% | 69.89% | -0.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 69.70% | 69.89% | -0.19% |
XRPZ vs. QSOL - Expense Ratio Comparison
XRPZ has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than QSOL's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XRPZ vs. QSOL - Dividend Comparison
XRPZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QSOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
QSOL Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF | 0.94% |
XRPZ Franklin XRP ETF | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XRPZ and QSOL have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XRPZ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XRPZ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for QSOL.
QSOL has the higher dividend yield at 0.94%, compared with 0.00% for XRPZ.
XRPZ is categorized as Blockchain, while QSOL is Cryptocurrency. XRPZ tracks CME CF XRP-Dollar Reference Rate - New York Variant, while QSOL tracks Lukka Prime Solana Reference Rate - Benchmark Price Return. They also come from different issuers: Franklin and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for XRPZ and 0.25% for QSOL.
Find the right allocation for XRPZ and QSOL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer