XRPZ vs. BLOK
XRPZ (Franklin XRP ETF) and BLOK (Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF) are both Blockchain funds. XRPZ is passively managed, while BLOK is actively managed. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XRPZ charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for BLOK.
Performance
XRPZ vs. BLOK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XRPZ achieves a -40.13% return, which is significantly lower than BLOK's 4.97% return.
XRPZ
- 1D
- -1.08%
- 1M
- -10.04%
- 6M
- -47.44%
- YTD
- -40.13%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BLOK
- 1D
- -3.74%
- 1M
- -9.78%
- 6M
- -7.07%
- YTD
- 4.97%
- 1Y
- -0.31%
- 3Y*
- 35.04%
- 5Y*
- 12.01%
- 10Y*
- —
XRPZ vs. BLOK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XRPZ Franklin XRP ETF | -40.13% | -11.90% |
BLOK Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF | 4.97% | 3.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between XRPZ and BLOK is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2025 | 0.70 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XRPZ vs. BLOK — Risk / Return Rank
XRPZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BLOK
XRPZ vs. BLOK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin XRP ETF (XRPZ) and Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF (BLOK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XRPZ | BLOK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.03 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.01 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -0.02 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XRPZ vs. BLOK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XRPZ drawdown since its inception was -55.39%, smaller than the maximum BLOK drawdown of -73.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRPZ and BLOK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XRPZ | BLOK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.39% | -73.33% | +17.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -35.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -35.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -73.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.60% | -18.85% | -33.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.91% | -25.91% | -8.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 16.93% | — |
Volatility
XRPZ vs. BLOK - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XRPZ | BLOK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.37% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 29.55% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 71.20% | 38.97% | +32.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 71.20% | 42.53% | +28.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 71.20% | 38.98% | +32.22% |
XRPZ vs. BLOK - Expense Ratio Comparison
XRPZ has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than BLOK's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
XRPZ vs. BLOK - Dividend Comparison
XRPZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BLOK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLOK Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF | 0.82% | 0.72% | 6.00% | 1.15% | 0.00% | 14.31% | 1.88% | 2.05% | 1.30% |
XRPZ Franklin XRP ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XRPZ and BLOK have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XRPZ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XRPZ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for BLOK.
BLOK has the higher dividend yield at 0.82%, compared with 0.00% for XRPZ.
They also come from different issuers: Franklin and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for XRPZ and 0.70% for BLOK.
Find the right allocation for XRPZ and BLOK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer