XRPR vs. WGMI

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

XRPR (REX-Osprey XRP ETF) and WGMI (CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. XRPR is passively managed, while WGMI is actively managed. Their 0.48 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.

Performance

XRPR vs. WGMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in REX-Osprey XRP ETF (XRPR) and CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF (WGMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XRPR achieves a -42.06% return, which is significantly lower than WGMI's 34.47% return.

XRPR

• 1D: -2.47%
• 1M: -2.58%
• 6M: -39.04%
• YTD: -42.06%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

WGMI

• 1D: -2.67%
• 1M: -3.25%
• 6M: 14.20%
• YTD: 34.47%
• 1Y: 119.73%
• 3Y*: 49.81%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 16.43%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
WGMI CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF	$36.52M	$32.75M	$41.50M
XRPR REX-Osprey XRP ETF	$159.08K	$159.59K	$242.33K

XRPR vs. WGMI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
XRPR REX-Osprey XRP ETF	-42.06%	-41.98%
WGMI CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF	34.47%	-7.00%

Correlation

The correlation between XRPR and WGMI is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2025	0.48

Return for Risk

XRPR vs. WGMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XRPR

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

WGMI

WGMI Risk / Return Rank: 51
WGMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
WGMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
WGMI Omega Ratio Rank: 51
WGMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
WGMI Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XRPR vs. WGMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX-Osprey XRP ETF (XRPR) and CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF (WGMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XRPR	WGMI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.25	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.95	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.23	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.05	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	3.96	—

Drawdowns

XRPR vs. WGMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XRPR drawdown since its inception was -67.27%, smaller than the maximum WGMI drawdown of -85.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRPR and WGMI.

Drawdown Indicators

	XRPR	WGMI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.27%	-85.76%	+18.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-50.94%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-62.79%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-66.38%	-28.63%	-37.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-45.14%	-41.97%	-3.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	26.29%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XRPR	WGMI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	35.22%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	61.62%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	74.44%	83.14%	-8.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	74.44%	82.40%	-7.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	74.44%	82.40%	-7.96%

XRPR vs. WGMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XRPR and WGMI have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

Dividends

XRPR vs. WGMI - Dividend Comparison

Neither XRPR nor WGMI has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
WGMI CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.22%	0.31%
XRPR REX-Osprey XRP ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XRPR and WGMI in my portfolio?

XRPR and WGMI have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XRPR or WGMI?

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XRPR or WGMI?

XRPR and WGMI have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XRPR or WGMI?

XRPR and WGMI have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between XRPR and WGMI?

They also come from different issuers: REX Shares and CoinShares.