XRPR vs. ETU
XRPR (REX-Osprey XRP ETF) and ETU (T-Rex 2X Long Ether Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XRPR is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the XRP, while ETU is a Leveraged Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by REX Shares. XRPR is passively managed, while ETU is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.87 means they have usually moved in the same direction. XRPR charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for ETU.
Performance
XRPR vs. ETU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XRPR achieves a -42.06% return, which is significantly higher than ETU's -71.52% return.
XRPR
- 1D
- -2.47%
- 1M
- -2.58%
- 6M
- -39.04%
- YTD
- -42.06%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
ETU
- 1D
- -6.16%
- 1M
- 17.43%
- 6M
- -63.60%
- YTD
- -71.52%
- 1Y
- -84.64%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -64.08%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $268.36K | $336.30K | $484.83K | |
| $159.08K | $159.59K | $242.33K |
XRPR vs. ETU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XRPR REX-Osprey XRP ETF | -42.06% | -41.98% |
ETU T-Rex 2X Long Ether Daily Target ETF | -71.52% | -64.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between XRPR and ETU is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2025 | 0.87 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XRPR vs. ETU — Risk / Return Rank
XRPR
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ETU
XRPR vs. ETU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX-Osprey XRP ETF (XRPR) and T-Rex 2X Long Ether Daily Target ETF (ETU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XRPR | ETU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.87 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.92 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.20 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XRPR vs. ETU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XRPR drawdown since its inception was -67.27%, smaller than the maximum ETU drawdown of -95.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRPR and ETU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XRPR | ETU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.27% | -95.01% | +27.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -93.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -66.38% | -93.07% | +26.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.14% | -65.08% | +19.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 71.86% | — |
Volatility
XRPR vs. ETU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XRPR | ETU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 26.16% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 92.92% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 74.44% | 134.09% | -59.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 74.44% | 143.54% | -69.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 74.44% | 143.54% | -69.10% |
XRPR vs. ETU - Expense Ratio Comparison
XRPR has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than ETU's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
XRPR vs. ETU - Dividend Comparison
XRPR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ETU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
ETU T-Rex 2X Long Ether Daily Target ETF | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.05% |
XRPR REX-Osprey XRP ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XRPR and ETU have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XRPR is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XRPR is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for ETU.
ETU has the higher dividend yield at 0.01%, compared with 0.00% for XRPR.
XRPR is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while ETU is Leveraged Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for XRPR and 0.95% for ETU.
Find the right allocation for XRPR and ETU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer