XRPR vs. CVSB
XRPR (REX-Osprey XRP ETF) and CVSB (Calvert Ultra-Short Investment Grade ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XRPR is a fund fund actively managed by REX, while CVSB is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Calvert. Both are actively managed. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XRPR charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for CVSB.
Performance
XRPR vs. CVSB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XRPR achieves a -39.45% return, which is significantly lower than CVSB's 1.84% return.
XRPR
- 1D
- 1.45%
- 1M
- -2.30%
- 6M
- -47.21%
- YTD
- -39.45%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CVSB
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- 6M
- 1.73%
- YTD
- 1.84%
- 1Y
- 4.34%
- 3Y*
- 5.45%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XRPR vs. CVSB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XRPR REX-Osprey XRP ETF | -39.45% | -41.98% |
CVSB Calvert Ultra-Short Investment Grade ETF | 1.84% | 1.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between XRPR and CVSB is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2025 | 0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XRPR vs. CVSB — Risk / Return Rank
XRPR
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CVSB
XRPR vs. CVSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX-Osprey XRP ETF (XRPR) and Calvert Ultra-Short Investment Grade ETF (CVSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XRPR | CVSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 2.45 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 19.32 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 81.79 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XRPR vs. CVSB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XRPR drawdown since its inception was -67.27%, which is greater than CVSB's maximum drawdown of -0.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRPR and CVSB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XRPR | CVSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.27% | -0.63% | -66.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -64.87% | -0.09% | -64.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.66% | -0.05% | -43.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.05% | — |
Volatility
XRPR vs. CVSB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XRPR | CVSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.27% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.56% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 76.43% | 0.84% | +75.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 76.43% | 1.31% | +75.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 76.43% | 1.31% | +75.12% |
XRPR vs. CVSB - Expense Ratio Comparison
XRPR has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than CVSB's 0.24% expense ratio.
Dividends
XRPR vs. CVSB - Dividend Comparison
XRPR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CVSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.31%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CVSB Calvert Ultra-Short Investment Grade ETF | 4.31% | 4.72% | 5.13% | 4.95% |
XRPR REX-Osprey XRP ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XRPR and CVSB have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CVSB is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CVSB is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for XRPR.
CVSB has the higher dividend yield at 4.31%, compared with 0.00% for XRPR.
They also come from different issuers: REX and Calvert. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for XRPR and 0.24% for CVSB.
Find the right allocation for XRPR and CVSB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer