XRPC vs. EZPZ
XRPC (Canary XRP ETF) and EZPZ (Franklin Crypto Index ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. XRPC is actively managed, while EZPZ is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XRPC charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for EZPZ.
Performance
XRPC vs. EZPZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XRPC achieves a -34.29% return, which is significantly lower than EZPZ's -28.21% return.
XRPC
- 1D
- -1.39%
- 1M
- -14.06%
- YTD
- -34.29%
- 6M
- -45.45%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EZPZ
- 1D
- -3.03%
- 1M
- -18.55%
- YTD
- -28.21%
- 6M
- -33.71%
- 1Y
- -39.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XRPC vs. EZPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XRPC Canary XRP ETF | -34.29% | -20.79% |
EZPZ Franklin Crypto Index ETF | -28.21% | -11.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between XRPC and EZPZ is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2025 | 0.91 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XRPC vs. EZPZ — Risk / Return Rank
XRPC
EZPZ
XRPC vs. EZPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Canary XRP ETF (XRPC) and Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XRPC | EZPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.92 | -0.61 | -0.31 |
Drawdowns
XRPC vs. EZPZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XRPC drawdown since its inception was -48.85%, smaller than the maximum EZPZ drawdown of -52.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRPC and EZPZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XRPC | EZPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.85% | -52.38% | +3.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -52.38% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.24% | -51.59% | +3.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.50% | -21.72% | -7.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 30.44% | — |
Volatility
XRPC vs. EZPZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XRPC | EZPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.74% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 36.71% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 75.88% | 46.83% | +29.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 75.88% | 47.65% | +28.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 75.88% | 47.65% | +28.23% |
XRPC vs. EZPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
XRPC has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than EZPZ's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
XRPC vs. EZPZ - Dividend Comparison
Neither XRPC nor EZPZ has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, XRPC and EZPZ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, EZPZ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EZPZ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for XRPC.
XRPC and EZPZ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Canary Capital and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for XRPC and 0.19% for EZPZ.
Find the right allocation for XRPC and EZPZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer