PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XRPC vs. EZET
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XRPC vs. EZET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Canary XRP ETF (XRPC) and Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XRPC achieves a -34.29% return, which is significantly higher than EZET's -39.43% return.


XRPC

1D
-1.39%
1M
-14.06%
YTD
-34.29%
6M
-45.45%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EZET

1D
-5.67%
1M
-23.67%
YTD
-39.43%
6M
-42.74%
1Y
-31.70%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XRPC vs. EZET - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
XRPC
Canary XRP ETF
-34.29%-20.79%
EZET
Franklin Ethereum ETF
-39.43%-6.32%

Correlation

The correlation between XRPC and EZET is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2025

0.87

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XRPC vs. EZET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XRPC

EZET
EZET Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
EZET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EZET Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
EZET Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
EZET Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
EZET Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XRPC vs. EZET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Canary XRP ETF (XRPC) and Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XRPC vs. EZET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XRPCEZETDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.92

-0.41

-0.51

Drawdowns

XRPC vs. EZET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XRPC drawdown since its inception was -48.85%, smaller than the maximum EZET drawdown of -64.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRPC and EZET.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XRPCEZETDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.85%

-64.05%

+15.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-62.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.24%

-62.87%

+14.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.50%

-32.67%

+3.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

37.73%

Volatility

XRPC vs. EZET - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XRPCEZETDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

75.88%

68.43%

+7.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

75.88%

72.37%

+3.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

75.88%

72.37%

+3.51%

XRPC vs. EZET - Expense Ratio Comparison

XRPC has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than EZET's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

XRPC vs. EZET - Dividend Comparison

Neither XRPC nor EZET has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XRPC and EZET have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EZET is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EZET is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for XRPC.

XRPC and EZET have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Canary Capital and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for XRPC and 0.19% for EZET.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XRPC and EZET

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer