PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XRP vs. CDC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XRP vs. CDC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bitwise XRP ETF (XRP) and VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CDC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XRP achieves a -41.81% return, which is significantly lower than CDC's 18.09% return.


XRP

1D
-1.16%
1M
-7.01%
6M
-30.50%
YTD
-41.81%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

CDC

1D
-0.61%
1M
1.50%
6M
8.57%
YTD
18.09%
1Y
21.95%
3Y*
14.24%
5Y*
6.76%
10Y*
10.34%
ALL TIME*
10.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.04M$983.49K$1.23M
$6.08M$6.45M$8.45M

XRP vs. CDC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XRP and CDC is -0.03, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2025

-0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XRP vs. CDC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XRP

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


CDC
CDC Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
CDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDC Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
CDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDC Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XRP vs. CDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise XRP ETF (XRP) and VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XRPCDCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.68

XRP vs. CDC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XRP vs. CDC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XRP drawdown since its inception was -55.49%, which is greater than CDC's maximum drawdown of -21.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRP and CDC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XRPCDCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.49%

-21.37%

-34.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-53.99%

-1.72%

-52.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.12%

-5.05%

-30.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.61%

Volatility

XRP vs. CDC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XRPCDCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

71.19%

10.32%

+60.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

71.19%

12.56%

+58.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

71.19%

13.22%

+57.97%

XRP vs. CDC - Expense Ratio Comparison

XRP has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than CDC's 0.37% expense ratio.


Dividends

XRP vs. CDC - Dividend Comparison

XRP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CDC
VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF
3.05%3.36%3.32%4.24%3.48%2.65%2.48%3.04%3.37%2.81%2.99%3.17%
XRP
Bitwise XRP ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XRP and CDC have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XRP is cheaper at 0.34% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XRP is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.37% for CDC.

CDC has the higher dividend yield at 3.05%, compared with 0.00% for XRP.

XRP is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while CDC is Low Volatility. They also come from different issuers: Bitwise and Crestview. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for XRP and 0.37% for CDC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XRP and CDC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer