XRP-USD vs. ASML
XRP-USD (XRP) is a cryptocurrency, while ASML (ASML Holding N.V.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, XRP-USD returned 5.05%/yr vs 22.97%/yr for ASML. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
XRP-USD vs. ASML - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XRP-USD achieves a -38.55% return, which is significantly lower than ASML's 74.80% return.
XRP-USD
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- -20.80%
- YTD
- -38.55%
- 6M
- -43.70%
- 1Y
- -48.43%
- 3Y*
- 29.52%
- 5Y*
- 5.05%
- 10Y*
- —
ASML
- 1D
- -1.89%
- 1M
- 17.83%
- YTD
- 74.80%
- 6M
- 73.02%
- 1Y
- 138.89%
- 3Y*
- 37.59%
- 5Y*
- 22.97%
- 10Y*
- 36.00%
XRP-USD vs. ASML - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XRP-USD XRP | -38.55% | -11.56% | 237.88% | 81.04% | -59.10% | 278.06% | 13.98% | -45.31% | -84.67% | 38,242.83% |
ASML ASML Holding N.V. | 74.80% | 56.51% | -7.70% | 39.91% | -30.49% | 64.13% | 66.06% | 93.56% | -9.80% | 56.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between XRP-USD and ASML is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2017 | 0.16 |
The correlation between XRP-USD and ASML shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (all time) to 0.27 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XRP-USD vs. ASML — Risk / Return Rank
XRP-USD
ASML
XRP-USD vs. ASML - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for XRP (XRP-USD) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XRP-USD | ASML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.45 | -0.54 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.70 | 7.83 | -8.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.10 | 21.08 | -22.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XRP-USD vs. ASML - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XRP-USD drawdown since its inception was -95.87%, which is greater than ASML's maximum drawdown of -90.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRP-USD and ASML.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XRP-USD | ASML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.87% | -90.00% | -5.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -69.23% | -17.85% | -51.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -69.23% | -45.38% | -23.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -77.83% | -56.84% | -20.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -56.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -68.19% | -1.89% | -66.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -70.99% | -28.12% | -42.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 43.81% | 6.63% | +37.18% |
Volatility
XRP-USD vs. ASML - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for XRP (XRP-USD) is 14.71%, while ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) has a volatility of 17.27%. This indicates that XRP-USD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XRP-USD | ASML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.71% | 17.27% | -2.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.28% | 34.58% | +11.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 56.25% | 42.75% | +13.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 72.37% | 42.44% | +29.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 111.79% | 38.72% | +73.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XRP-USD and ASML have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ASML has higher volatility (17.27%) compared to XRP-USD (14.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XRP-USD dropped -95.87% vs ASML's -90.00%.
ASML currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.27 vs -0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XRP-USD and ASML
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer