XRMI vs. XSPI
XRMI (Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF) and XSPI (NEOS Boosted S&P 500 High Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds - XRMI tracks the Cboe S&P 500 Risk Managed Income Index while XSPI tracks the S&P 500. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XRMI charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.98%/yr for XSPI.
Performance
XRMI vs. XSPI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
XRMI
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 1.38%
- YTD
- 1.75%
- 6M
- 2.96%
- 1Y
- 9.48%
- 3Y*
- 6.71%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XSPI
- 1D
- -0.89%
- 1M
- 5.09%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XRMI vs. XSPI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
XRMI Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF | 0.65% |
XSPI NEOS Boosted S&P 500 High Income ETF | 8.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between XRMI and XSPI is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2026 | 0.82 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XRMI vs. XSPI — Risk / Return Rank
XRMI
XSPI
XRMI vs. XSPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI) and NEOS Boosted S&P 500 High Income ETF (XSPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XRMI | XSPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.78 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.48 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.90 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.70 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XRMI | XSPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.78 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 1.55 | -1.18 |
Drawdowns
XRMI vs. XSPI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XRMI drawdown since its inception was -15.31%, which is greater than XSPI's maximum drawdown of -11.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRMI and XSPI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XRMI | XSPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.31% | -11.59% | -3.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.02% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.34% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.20% | -0.89% | +0.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.94% | -2.23% | -3.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.23% | — | — |
Volatility
XRMI vs. XSPI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XRMI | XSPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.89% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.21% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.39% | 17.64% | -12.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.91% | 17.64% | -10.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.91% | 17.64% | -10.73% |
XRMI vs. XSPI - Expense Ratio Comparison
XRMI has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than XSPI's 0.98% expense ratio.
Dividends
XRMI vs. XSPI - Dividend Comparison
XRMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.62%, more than XSPI's 6.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XRMI Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF | 12.62% | 12.35% | 11.86% | 12.62% | 12.84% | 2.93% |
XSPI NEOS Boosted S&P 500 High Income ETF | 6.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XRMI and XSPI have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XRMI is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XRMI is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for XSPI.
XRMI has the higher dividend yield at 12.62%, compared with 6.83% for XSPI.
XRMI tracks Cboe S&P 500 Risk Managed Income Index, while XSPI tracks S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Global X and NEOS Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for XRMI and 0.98% for XSPI.
Find the right allocation for XRMI and XSPI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer