PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XRMI vs. TCAL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XRMI vs. TCAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI) and T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF (TCAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XRMI vs. TCAL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XRMI having a -2.52% return and TCAL slightly higher at -2.47%.


XRMI

1D
0.81%
1M
-4.04%
YTD
-2.52%
6M
1.58%
1Y
3.59%
3Y*
6.04%
5Y*
10Y*

TCAL

1D
0.99%
1M
-5.52%
YTD
-2.47%
6M
-2.85%
1Y
-1.38%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XRMI vs. TCAL - Expense Ratio Comparison

XRMI has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than TCAL's 0.34% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

XRMI vs. TCAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XRMI
XRMI Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
XRMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XRMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
XRMI Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
XRMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
XRMI Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

TCAL
TCAL Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
TCAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TCAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
TCAL Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
TCAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
TCAL Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XRMI vs. TCAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI) and T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF (TCAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XRMITCALDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.52

-0.12

+0.64

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.76

-0.09

+0.85

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

0.99

+0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.79

-0.07

+0.86

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.73

-0.22

+2.95

XRMI vs. TCAL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XRMI Sharpe Ratio is 0.52, which is higher than the TCAL Sharpe Ratio of -0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XRMI and TCAL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XRMITCALDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

-0.12

+0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

-0.08

+0.32

Correlation

The correlation between XRMI and TCAL is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

XRMI vs. TCAL - Dividend Comparison

XRMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.83%, more than TCAL's 11.74% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
XRMI
Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF
12.83%12.35%11.86%12.62%12.84%2.93%
TCAL
T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF
11.74%8.34%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

XRMI vs. TCAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XRMI drawdown since its inception was -15.31%, which is greater than TCAL's maximum drawdown of -7.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRMI and TCAL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XRMITCALDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.31%

-7.24%

-8.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.02%

-7.24%

+2.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.25%

-5.52%

+1.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.10%

-1.59%

-4.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.45%

2.13%

-0.68%

Volatility

XRMI vs. TCAL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI) is 2.62%, while T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF (TCAL) has a volatility of 3.36%. This indicates that XRMI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TCAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XRMITCALDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.62%

3.36%

-0.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.50%

7.61%

-3.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.88%

11.70%

-4.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.99%

11.68%

-4.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.99%

11.68%

-4.69%