PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XRMI vs. ICOI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XRMI vs. ICOI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI) and Bitwise COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (ICOI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XRMI achieves a 3.64% return, which is significantly higher than ICOI's -22.45% return.


XRMI

1D
0.11%
1M
1.10%
6M
2.36%
YTD
3.64%
1Y
10.84%
3Y*
6.75%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.76%

ICOI

1D
0.10%
1M
-1.71%
6M
-13.91%
YTD
-22.45%
1Y
-43.09%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-21.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$610.26K$661.95K$611.06K
$126.16K$125.56K$168.31K

XRMI vs. ICOI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XRMI and ICOI is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2025

0.41

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XRMI vs. ICOI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XRMI
XRMI Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
XRMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XRMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
XRMI Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
XRMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
XRMI Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

ICOI
ICOI Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
ICOI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICOI Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICOI Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
ICOI Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICOI Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XRMI vs. ICOI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI) and Bitwise COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (ICOI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XRMIICOIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

0.81

+0.53

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.98

-0.95

+2.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.99

-1.41

+9.40

XRMI vs. ICOI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XRMI Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is higher than the ICOI Sharpe Ratio of -1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XRMI and ICOI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XRMI vs. ICOI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XRMI drawdown since its inception was -15.31%, smaller than the maximum ICOI drawdown of -59.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRMI and ICOI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XRMIICOIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.31%

-59.32%

+44.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.02%

-54.58%

+49.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.23%

-55.37%

+55.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.75%

-30.72%

+24.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.25%

38.57%

-37.32%

Volatility

XRMI vs. ICOI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI) is 1.60%, while Bitwise COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (ICOI) has a volatility of 8.35%. This indicates that XRMI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ICOI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XRMIICOIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.60%

8.35%

-6.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.46%

35.53%

-31.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.68%

49.80%

-44.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.87%

49.33%

-42.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.87%

49.33%

-42.46%

XRMI vs. ICOI - Expense Ratio Comparison

XRMI has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than ICOI's 0.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

XRMI vs. ICOI - Dividend Comparison

XRMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.52%, less than ICOI's 202.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
ICOI
Bitwise COIN Option Income Strategy ETF
202.94%247.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XRMI
Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF
12.52%12.35%11.86%12.62%12.84%2.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


XRMI and ICOI have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ICOI has higher volatility (8.35%) compared to XRMI (1.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XRMI dropped -15.31% vs ICOI's -59.32%.

On 1-year performance, XRMI leads with 10.84% vs -43.09% for ICOI. On fees, XRMI is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, XRMI has been the lower-risk option at 1.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XRMI has performed better with a 10.84% return vs -43.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XRMI is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for ICOI.

ICOI has the higher dividend yield at 202.94%, compared with 12.52% for XRMI.

They also come from different issuers: Global X and Bitwise. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for XRMI and 0.98% for ICOI.

XRMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs -1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XRMI and ICOI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer