PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ICOI vs. CONY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ICOI vs. CONY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bitwise COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (ICOI) and YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ICOI achieves a -22.48% return, which is significantly higher than CONY's -26.79% return.


ICOI

1D
-2.85%
1M
-9.13%
YTD
-22.48%
6M
-27.43%
1Y
-46.01%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CONY

1D
-3.16%
1M
-11.77%
YTD
-26.79%
6M
-30.97%
1Y
-49.52%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ICOI vs. CONY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ICOI and CONY is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2025

0.92

The correlation between ICOI and CONY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ICOI vs. CONY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ICOI
ICOI Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
ICOI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICOI Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICOI Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
ICOI Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICOI Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

CONY
CONY Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
CONY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CONY Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
CONY Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
CONY Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
CONY Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ICOI vs. CONY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (ICOI) and YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ICOICONYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.84

0.86

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.79

-0.78

-0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.19

-1.24

+0.05

ICOI vs. CONY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ICOI Sharpe Ratio is -0.94, which is comparable to the CONY Sharpe Ratio of -0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ICOI and CONY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ICOI vs. CONY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICOI drawdown since its inception was -58.10%, smaller than the maximum CONY drawdown of -63.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICOI and CONY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ICOICONYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.10%

-63.57%

+5.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-58.10%

-63.39%

+5.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-55.39%

-58.53%

+3.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.53%

-22.83%

-5.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

38.60%

39.89%

-1.29%

Volatility

ICOI vs. CONY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bitwise COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (ICOI) is 13.77%, while YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY) has a volatility of 15.74%. This indicates that ICOI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CONY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ICOICONYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.77%

15.74%

-1.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.52%

44.42%

-8.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.30%

57.79%

-8.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.01%

59.89%

-9.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.01%

59.89%

-9.88%

ICOI vs. CONY - Expense Ratio Comparison

ICOI has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is lower than CONY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

ICOI vs. CONY - Dividend Comparison

ICOI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 338.69%, more than CONY's 204.97% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
CONY
YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF
204.97%192.07%155.66%16.43%
ICOI
Bitwise COIN Option Income Strategy ETF
338.69%247.40%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, ICOI and CONY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

CONY has higher volatility (15.74%) compared to ICOI (13.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICOI dropped -58.10% vs CONY's -63.57%.

On 1-year performance, ICOI leads with -46.01% vs -49.52% for CONY. On fees, ICOI is cheaper at 0.98% per year. On volatility, ICOI has been the lower-risk option at 13.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ICOI has performed better with a -46.01% return vs -49.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ICOI is cheaper with a 0.98% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for CONY.

ICOI has the higher dividend yield at 338.69%, compared with 204.97% for CONY.

They also come from different issuers: Bitwise and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for ICOI and 0.99% for CONY.

CONY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.86 vs -0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ICOI and CONY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer