XRMI vs. ACYS
XRMI (Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF) and ACYS (FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. XRMI is passively managed, while ACYS is actively managed. Their 0.45 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. XRMI charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ACYS.
Performance
XRMI vs. ACYS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
XRMI
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 1.10%
- 6M
- 2.36%
- YTD
- 3.64%
- 1Y
- 10.84%
- 3Y*
- 6.75%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.76%
ACYS
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $8.22M | $7.08M | $6.02M | |
| $126.16K | $125.56K | $168.31K |
XRMI vs. ACYS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
XRMI Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF | 3.84% |
ACYS FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF | 2.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between XRMI and ACYS is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2026 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XRMI vs. ACYS — Risk / Return Rank
XRMI
ACYS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XRMI vs. ACYS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI) and FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF (ACYS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XRMI | ACYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.98 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.99 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XRMI vs. ACYS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XRMI drawdown since its inception was -15.31%, which is greater than ACYS's maximum drawdown of -0.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRMI and ACYS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XRMI | ACYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.31% | -0.78% | -14.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.02% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.34% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.23% | -0.15% | -0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.75% | -0.17% | -5.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.25% | — | — |
Volatility
XRMI vs. ACYS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XRMI | ACYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.60% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.46% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.68% | 3.76% | +1.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.87% | 3.76% | +3.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.87% | 3.76% | +3.11% |
XRMI vs. ACYS - Expense Ratio Comparison
XRMI has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than ACYS's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
XRMI vs. ACYS - Dividend Comparison
XRMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.52%, more than ACYS's 0.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACYS FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF | 0.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XRMI Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF | 12.52% | 12.35% | 11.86% | 12.62% | 12.84% | 2.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XRMI and ACYS have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XRMI is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XRMI is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ACYS.
XRMI has the higher dividend yield at 12.52%, compared with 0.60% for ACYS.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for XRMI and 0.75% for ACYS.
Find the right allocation for XRMI and ACYS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer