PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XRH0.L vs. KF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XRH0.L vs. KF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC (XRH0.L) and The Korea Fund Inc (KF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XRH0.L achieves a -28.17% return, which is significantly lower than KF's 107.08% return. Over the past 10 years, XRH0.L has outperformed KF with an annualized return of 27.32%, while KF has yielded a comparatively lower 16.77% annualized return.


XRH0.L

1D
1.54%
1M
-10.60%
YTD
-28.17%
6M
-23.84%
1Y
40.60%
3Y*
18.05%
5Y*
-15.19%
10Y*
27.32%

KF

1D
3.30%
1M
0.68%
YTD
107.08%
6M
104.71%
1Y
182.72%
3Y*
49.92%
5Y*
20.00%
10Y*
16.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XRH0.L vs. KF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XRH0.L
Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC
-28.17%205.23%-14.69%-60.81%-4.46%-15.51%183.21%132.83%46.39%100.00%
KF
The Korea Fund Inc
107.08%99.36%-19.29%12.34%-30.02%8.44%37.14%6.83%-19.26%42.50%

Correlation

The correlation between XRH0.L and KF is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2011

0.07

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XRH0.L vs. KF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XRH0.L
XRH0.L Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
XRH0.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XRH0.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
XRH0.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
XRH0.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
XRH0.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

KF
KF Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
KF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
KF Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
KF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
KF Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XRH0.L vs. KF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC (XRH0.L) and The Korea Fund Inc (KF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XRH0.LKFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.58

-0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.00

7.23

-6.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.91

25.50

-23.59

XRH0.L vs. KF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XRH0.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.45, which is lower than the KF Sharpe Ratio of 3.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XRH0.L and KF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XRH0.L vs. KF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XRH0.L drawdown since its inception was -85.90%, roughly equal to the maximum KF drawdown of -85.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRH0.L and KF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XRH0.LKFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.90%

-85.25%

-0.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-40.30%

-25.42%

-14.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-46.87%

-28.04%

-18.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-81.27%

-47.02%

-34.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-85.90%

-52.91%

-32.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-67.56%

-6.05%

-61.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-50.59%

-37.83%

-12.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.21%

7.20%

+14.01%

Volatility

XRH0.L vs. KF - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC (XRH0.L) has a higher volatility of 28.09% compared to The Korea Fund Inc (KF) at 25.49%. This indicates that XRH0.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XRH0.LKFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

28.09%

25.49%

+2.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

70.45%

43.03%

+27.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

89.78%

46.24%

+43.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

69.02%

29.37%

+39.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

66.84%

26.87%

+39.97%

XRH0.L vs. KF - Expense Ratio Comparison

XRH0.L has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than KF's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

XRH0.L vs. KF - Dividend Comparison

XRH0.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KF
The Korea Fund Inc
0.58%1.20%2.46%0.00%15.93%26.50%1.30%0.24%18.67%9.75%1.03%13.66%
XRH0.L
Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XRH0.L and KF have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XRH0.L and KF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer