PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XRH0.L vs. AIGI.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XRH0.L vs. AIGI.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC (XRH0.L) and WisdomTree Industrial Metals (AIGI.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XRH0.L achieves a -15.28% return, which is significantly lower than AIGI.L's 15.82% return. Over the past 10 years, XRH0.L has outperformed AIGI.L with an annualized return of 29.93%, while AIGI.L has yielded a comparatively lower 8.39% annualized return.


XRH0.L

1D
0.78%
1M
-3.00%
YTD
-15.28%
6M
10.23%
1Y
73.21%
3Y*
18.90%
5Y*
-13.58%
10Y*
29.93%

AIGI.L

1D
-0.40%
1M
4.46%
YTD
15.82%
6M
21.54%
1Y
32.92%
3Y*
13.33%
5Y*
5.83%
10Y*
8.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XRH0.L vs. AIGI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XRH0.L
Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC
-15.28%205.23%-14.69%-60.81%-4.46%-15.51%183.21%132.83%46.39%100.00%
AIGI.L
WisdomTree Industrial Metals
15.82%19.43%3.07%-11.78%-2.91%28.67%14.31%6.29%-19.44%26.54%

Correlation

The correlation between XRH0.L and AIGI.L is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2011

0.10

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XRH0.L vs. AIGI.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XRH0.L
XRH0.L Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
XRH0.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XRH0.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
XRH0.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
XRH0.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
XRH0.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

AIGI.L
AIGI.L Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
AIGI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIGI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIGI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
AIGI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIGI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XRH0.L vs. AIGI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC (XRH0.L) and WisdomTree Industrial Metals (AIGI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XRH0.LAIGI.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.32

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.12

2.56

-0.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.10

6.42

-2.32

XRH0.L vs. AIGI.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XRH0.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is lower than the AIGI.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XRH0.L and AIGI.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XRH0.LAIGI.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.03

1.68

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.21

0.27

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.43

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.20

-0.01

+0.20

Drawdowns

XRH0.L vs. AIGI.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XRH0.L drawdown since its inception was -85.90%, which is greater than AIGI.L's maximum drawdown of -69.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRH0.L and AIGI.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XRH0.LAIGI.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.90%

-69.67%

-16.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.33%

-12.83%

-21.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-46.87%

-20.72%

-26.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-82.47%

-41.99%

-40.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-85.90%

-41.99%

-43.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-61.74%

-24.66%

-37.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-51.31%

-45.42%

-5.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.81%

5.11%

+12.70%

Volatility

XRH0.L vs. AIGI.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC (XRH0.L) has a higher volatility of 12.10% compared to WisdomTree Industrial Metals (AIGI.L) at 5.54%. This indicates that XRH0.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AIGI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XRH0.LAIGI.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.10%

5.54%

+6.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

52.72%

13.88%

+38.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

71.00%

19.55%

+51.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

64.08%

21.95%

+42.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

64.25%

19.49%

+44.76%

XRH0.L vs. AIGI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XRH0.L has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than AIGI.L's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

XRH0.L vs. AIGI.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XRH0.L nor AIGI.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XRH0.L and AIGI.L have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AIGI.L is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AIGI.L is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for XRH0.L.

XRH0.L tracks Rhodium, while AIGI.L tracks Bloomberg Industrial Metals. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for XRH0.L and 0.49% for AIGI.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XRH0.L and AIGI.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer