PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XQUD.DE vs. ZPR5.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XQUD.DE vs. ZPR5.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF (XQUD.DE) and SPDR ICE BofA 0-5 Year EM USD Government Bond UCITS ETF (ZPR5.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XQUD.DE achieves a 1.98% return, which is significantly lower than ZPR5.DE's 2.14% return.


XQUD.DE

1D
-0.03%
1M
1.14%
YTD
1.98%
6M
1.13%
1Y
6.03%
3Y*
2.35%
5Y*
10Y*

ZPR5.DE

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.89%
YTD
2.14%
6M
1.74%
1Y
3.56%
3Y*
3.25%
5Y*
3.18%
10Y*
2.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XQUD.DE vs. ZPR5.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XQUD.DE
Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF
1.98%-1.36%5.23%3.70%-0.16%
ZPR5.DE
SPDR ICE BofA 0-5 Year EM USD Government Bond UCITS ETF
2.14%-4.12%11.04%2.52%0.56%

Correlation

The correlation between XQUD.DE and ZPR5.DE is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2022

0.69

The correlation between XQUD.DE and ZPR5.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (all time) to 0.81 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XQUD.DE vs. ZPR5.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XQUD.DE
XQUD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
XQUD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XQUD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
XQUD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
XQUD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
XQUD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

ZPR5.DE
ZPR5.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
ZPR5.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZPR5.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZPR5.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
ZPR5.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZPR5.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XQUD.DE vs. ZPR5.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF (XQUD.DE) and SPDR ICE BofA 0-5 Year EM USD Government Bond UCITS ETF (ZPR5.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XQUD.DEZPR5.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.11

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.56

1.11

+0.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.64

2.73

+1.91

XQUD.DE vs. ZPR5.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XQUD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is higher than the ZPR5.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XQUD.DE and ZPR5.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XQUD.DEZPR5.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.04

0.65

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.39

-0.10

Drawdowns

XQUD.DE vs. ZPR5.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XQUD.DE drawdown since its inception was -12.01%, smaller than the maximum ZPR5.DE drawdown of -14.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XQUD.DE and ZPR5.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XQUD.DEZPR5.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.01%

-14.48%

+2.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.84%

-3.21%

-0.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.40%

-9.72%

-1.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.99%

-4.28%

+1.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.54%

-4.88%

-0.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.30%

1.30%

0.00%

Volatility

XQUD.DE vs. ZPR5.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF (XQUD.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.12% compared to SPDR ICE BofA 0-5 Year EM USD Government Bond UCITS ETF (ZPR5.DE) at 0.96%. This indicates that XQUD.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZPR5.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XQUD.DEZPR5.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.12%

0.96%

+0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.74%

3.56%

+0.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.77%

5.43%

+0.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.98%

7.04%

+0.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.98%

7.20%

+0.78%

XQUD.DE vs. ZPR5.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XQUD.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than ZPR5.DE's 0.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

XQUD.DE vs. ZPR5.DE - Dividend Comparison

XQUD.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ZPR5.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.83%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XQUD.DE
Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZPR5.DE
SPDR ICE BofA 0-5 Year EM USD Government Bond UCITS ETF
4.83%5.10%4.16%3.16%2.54%2.63%3.53%3.34%2.73%3.18%2.72%1.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


XQUD.DE and ZPR5.DE have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZPR5.DE is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZPR5.DE is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for XQUD.DE.

XQUD.DE tracks iBoxx® MSCI ESG USD Emerging Markets Sovereigns Quality Weighted, while ZPR5.DE tracks ICE BofA Emerging Markets USD Government Bond 0-5 ex-144a. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for XQUD.DE and 0.42% for ZPR5.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XQUD.DE and ZPR5.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer