ESGP.L vs. SLVI.L

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about HANetf AuAg ESG Gold Mining UCITS ETF (ESGP.L) and IncomeShares Silver+ Yield ETP (SLVI.L).

ESGP.L and SLVI.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ESGP.L is a passively managed fund by HANetf that tracks the performance of the EMIX Global Mining Global Gold TR USD. It was launched on Jul 2, 2021. SLVI.L is an actively managed fund by Leverage Shares. It was launched on Jun 27, 2025.

Performance

ESGP.L vs. SLVI.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in HANetf AuAg ESG Gold Mining UCITS ETF (ESGP.L) and IncomeShares Silver+ Yield ETP (SLVI.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ESGP.L vs. SLVI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ESGP.L HANetf AuAg ESG Gold Mining UCITS ETF	7.18%	59.80%
SLVI.L IncomeShares Silver+ Yield ETP	2.46%	76.34%

Different Trading Currencies

ESGP.L is traded in GBp, while SLVI.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SLVI.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESGP.L achieves a 7.18% return, which is significantly higher than SLVI.L's 2.46% return.

ESGP.L

• 1D: 2.36%
• 1M: -20.65%
• YTD: 7.18%
• 6M: 16.16%
• 1Y: 95.45%
• 3Y*: 34.69%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SLVI.L

• 1D: 3.39%
• 1M: -16.81%
• YTD: 2.46%
• 6M: 43.36%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESGP.L vs. SLVI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESGP.L has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SLVI.L's 0.35% expense ratio.

ESGP.L

HANetf AuAg ESG Gold Mining UCITS ETF

SLVI.L

IncomeShares Silver+ Yield ETP

Return for Risk

ESGP.L vs. SLVI.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESGP.L

ESGP.L Risk / Return Rank: 91
ESGP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
ESGP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
ESGP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 89
ESGP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
ESGP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESGP.L vs. SLVI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HANetf AuAg ESG Gold Mining UCITS ETF (ESGP.L) and IncomeShares Silver+ Yield ETP (SLVI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ESGP.L	SLVI.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.39	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.69	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.29	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.73	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ESGP.L	SLVI.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.39	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.68	2.28	-1.61

Correlation

The correlation between ESGP.L and SLVI.L is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

ESGP.L vs. SLVI.L - Dividend Comparison

ESGP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SLVI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%.

	TTM	2025
ESGP.L HANetf AuAg ESG Gold Mining UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%
SLVI.L IncomeShares Silver+ Yield ETP	0.07%	0.02%

Drawdowns

ESGP.L vs. SLVI.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESGP.L drawdown since its inception was -36.54%, roughly equal to the maximum SLVI.L drawdown of -35.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGP.L and SLVI.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	ESGP.L	SLVI.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.54%	-37.77%	+1.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.67%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-20.65%	-31.59%	+10.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.27%	-8.07%	-5.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.04%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ESGP.L	SLVI.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.03%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.32%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.64%	51.54%	-11.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.63%	51.54%	-18.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.63%	51.54%	-18.91%