PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XPPT.DE vs. SILJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XPPT.DE vs. SILJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers IE Physical Platinum ETC Securities (XPPT.DE) and Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XPPT.DE is traded in EUR, while SILJ is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SILJ values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XPPT.DE achieves a -14.27% return, which is significantly lower than SILJ's 8.27% return.


XPPT.DE

1D
0.50%
1M
-6.98%
YTD
-14.27%
6M
14.83%
1Y
63.30%
3Y*
18.63%
5Y*
10.73%
10Y*

SILJ

1D
0.00%
1M
-3.48%
YTD
8.27%
6M
17.88%
1Y
95.50%
3Y*
43.81%
5Y*
14.27%
10Y*
9.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XPPT.DE vs. SILJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XPPT.DE
Xtrackers IE Physical Platinum ETC Securities
-14.27%114.44%-3.35%-8.94%16.19%-1.94%14.62%
SILJ
Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF
-2.87%150.20%13.42%-8.05%-10.18%-17.46%27.44%

Correlation

The correlation between XPPT.DE and SILJ is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2020

0.44

The correlation between XPPT.DE and SILJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.44 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XPPT.DE vs. SILJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XPPT.DE
XPPT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
XPPT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XPPT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
XPPT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
XPPT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
XPPT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

SILJ
SILJ Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
SILJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SILJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
SILJ Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
SILJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
SILJ Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XPPT.DE vs. SILJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers IE Physical Platinum ETC Securities (XPPT.DE) and Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XPPT.DESILJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.30

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.08

2.87

-0.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.24

7.00

-2.76

XPPT.DE vs. SILJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XPPT.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is comparable to the SILJ Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XPPT.DE and SILJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XPPT.DESILJDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.52

1.82

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

0.34

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.11

+0.32

Drawdowns

XPPT.DE vs. SILJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XPPT.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.37%, smaller than the maximum SILJ drawdown of -74.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XPPT.DE and SILJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XPPT.DESILJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.37%

-74.59%

+41.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.37%

-33.46%

+0.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.37%

-33.46%

+0.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.37%

-49.98%

+16.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.02%

-25.37%

-6.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.57%

-38.41%

+23.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.43%

13.69%

+2.74%

Volatility

XPPT.DE vs. SILJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers IE Physical Platinum ETC Securities (XPPT.DE) is 10.59%, while Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) has a volatility of 15.77%. This indicates that XPPT.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SILJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XPPT.DESILJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.59%

15.77%

-5.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.66%

43.44%

-3.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.67%

53.11%

-7.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.36%

41.82%

-11.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.46%

44.15%

-13.69%

XPPT.DE vs. SILJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

XPPT.DE has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than SILJ's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

XPPT.DE vs. SILJ - Dividend Comparison

XPPT.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SILJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SILJ
Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF
2.10%2.00%7.26%0.01%0.05%0.36%1.23%1.45%1.66%0.00%0.52%2.46%
XPPT.DE
Xtrackers IE Physical Platinum ETC Securities
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XPPT.DE and SILJ have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XPPT.DE is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XPPT.DE is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for SILJ.

XPPT.DE is categorized as Precious Metals, while SILJ is Silver. XPPT.DE tracks Platinum, while SILJ tracks Nasdaq Junior Silver Miners Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for XPPT.DE and 0.69% for SILJ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XPPT.DE and SILJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer