PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XPPT.DE vs. SIVR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XPPT.DE vs. SIVR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers IE Physical Platinum ETC Securities (XPPT.DE) and abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XPPT.DE is traded in EUR, while SIVR is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SIVR values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XPPT.DE achieves a -14.27% return, which is significantly lower than SIVR's -2.50% return.


XPPT.DE

1D
0.50%
1M
-6.98%
YTD
-14.27%
6M
14.83%
1Y
63.30%
3Y*
18.63%
5Y*
10.73%
10Y*

SIVR

1D
-7.36%
1M
-10.49%
YTD
-2.50%
6M
17.61%
1Y
88.81%
3Y*
38.44%
5Y*
20.55%
10Y*
14.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XPPT.DE vs. SIVR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XPPT.DE
Xtrackers IE Physical Platinum ETC Securities
-14.27%114.44%-3.35%-8.94%16.19%-1.94%14.62%
SIVR
abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF
-2.50%116.22%29.07%-3.88%8.95%-5.77%34.23%

Correlation

The correlation between XPPT.DE and SIVR is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2020

0.47

The correlation between XPPT.DE and SIVR shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (all time) to 0.58 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XPPT.DE vs. SIVR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XPPT.DE
XPPT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
XPPT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XPPT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
XPPT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
XPPT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
XPPT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

SIVR
SIVR Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
SIVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIVR Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
SIVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIVR Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XPPT.DE vs. SIVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers IE Physical Platinum ETC Securities (XPPT.DE) and abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XPPT.DESIVRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.31

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.08

2.21

-0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.24

4.69

-0.45

XPPT.DE vs. SIVR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XPPT.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is comparable to the SIVR Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XPPT.DE and SIVR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XPPT.DESIVRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.52

1.55

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

0.60

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.36

+0.07

Drawdowns

XPPT.DE vs. SIVR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XPPT.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.37%, smaller than the maximum SIVR drawdown of -67.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XPPT.DE and SIVR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XPPT.DESIVRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.37%

-67.19%

+33.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.37%

-40.33%

+6.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.37%

-40.33%

+6.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.37%

-40.33%

+6.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.02%

-39.46%

+7.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.57%

-37.53%

+22.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.43%

19.01%

-2.58%

Volatility

XPPT.DE vs. SIVR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers IE Physical Platinum ETC Securities (XPPT.DE) is 10.59%, while abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) has a volatility of 16.18%. This indicates that XPPT.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SIVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XPPT.DESIVRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.59%

16.18%

-5.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.66%

57.08%

-17.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.67%

57.75%

-12.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.36%

34.55%

-4.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.46%

30.39%

+0.07%

XPPT.DE vs. SIVR - Expense Ratio Comparison

XPPT.DE has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than SIVR's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

XPPT.DE vs. SIVR - Dividend Comparison

Neither XPPT.DE nor SIVR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XPPT.DE and SIVR have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SIVR is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SIVR is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for XPPT.DE.

XPPT.DE is categorized as Precious Metals, while SIVR is Silver. XPPT.DE tracks Platinum, while SIVR tracks LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt). They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and abrdn. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for XPPT.DE and 0.30% for SIVR.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XPPT.DE and SIVR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer