XPEG vs. GLWG
XPEG (Leverage Shares 2X Long XPEV Daily ETF) and GLWG (Leverage Shares 2X Long GLW Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares - XPEG tracks the XPeng Inc. (XPEV) while GLWG tracks the Corning Incorporated (GLW). Both are passively managed. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.
Performance
XPEG vs. GLWG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
XPEG
- 1D
- -4.62%
- 1M
- 15.98%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GLWG
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 46.27%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XPEG vs. GLWG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
XPEG Leverage Shares 2X Long XPEV Daily ETF | -21.69% |
GLWG Leverage Shares 2X Long GLW Daily ETF | 85.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between XPEG and GLWG is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2026 | 0.51 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XPEG vs. GLWG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long XPEV Daily ETF (XPEG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long GLW Daily ETF (GLWG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XPEG | GLWG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.75 | 8.78 | -9.53 |
Drawdowns
XPEG vs. GLWG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XPEG drawdown since its inception was -55.25%, which is greater than GLWG's maximum drawdown of -29.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XPEG and GLWG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XPEG | GLWG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.25% | -29.53% | -25.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.77% | -10.32% | -29.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.77% | -10.71% | -24.06% |
Volatility
XPEG vs. GLWG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XPEG | GLWG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 99.56% | 151.06% | -51.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 99.56% | 151.06% | -51.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 99.56% | 151.06% | -51.50% |
XPEG vs. GLWG - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XPEG and GLWG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Dividends
XPEG vs. GLWG - Dividend Comparison
Neither XPEG nor GLWG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XPEG and GLWG have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XPEG and GLWG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.
XPEG and GLWG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
XPEG tracks XPeng Inc. (XPEV), while GLWG tracks Corning Incorporated (GLW).
Find the right allocation for XPEG and GLWG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer