PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XPEG vs. MUU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XPEG vs. MUU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long XPEV Daily ETF (XPEG) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


XPEG

1D
-8.68%
1M
-35.28%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MUU

1D
-26.28%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XPEG vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XPEG and MUU is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2026

0.90

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XPEG vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long XPEV Daily ETF (XPEG) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XPEG vs. MUU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XPEG vs. MUU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XPEG drawdown since its inception was -69.48%, which is greater than MUU's maximum drawdown of -26.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XPEG and MUU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XPEGMUUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.48%

-26.28%

-43.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-69.48%

-26.28%

-43.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-39.06%

-10.19%

-28.87%

Volatility

XPEG vs. MUU - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XPEGMUUDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

98.03%

295.32%

-197.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

98.03%

295.32%

-197.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

98.03%

295.32%

-197.29%

XPEG vs. MUU - Expense Ratio Comparison

XPEG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than MUU's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

XPEG vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison

Neither XPEG nor MUU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, XPEG and MUU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, XPEG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XPEG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for MUU.

XPEG and MUU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

XPEG tracks XPeng Inc. (XPEV), while MUU tracks Micron Technology, Inc. (200% Daily). They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for XPEG and 1.01% for MUU.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XPEG and MUU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer