PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XPAY vs. QDTE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XPAY vs. QDTE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF (XPAY) and Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XPAY achieves a 11.30% return, which is significantly lower than QDTE's 16.06% return.


XPAY

1D
0.42%
1M
4.66%
YTD
11.30%
6M
11.03%
1Y
27.57%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QDTE

1D
-0.45%
1M
7.12%
YTD
16.06%
6M
15.73%
1Y
39.17%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XPAY vs. QDTE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XPAY and QDTE is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2024

0.91

The correlation between XPAY and QDTE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XPAY vs. QDTE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XPAY
XPAY Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
XPAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XPAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
XPAY Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
XPAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
XPAY Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

QDTE
QDTE Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
QDTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDTE Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
QDTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDTE Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XPAY vs. QDTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF (XPAY) and Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XPAYQDTEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.46

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.97

3.86

-0.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.67

15.60

-1.93

XPAY vs. QDTE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XPAY Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is comparable to the QDTE Sharpe Ratio of 2.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XPAY and QDTE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XPAYQDTEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.34

2.66

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.23

1.29

-0.06

Drawdowns

XPAY vs. QDTE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XPAY drawdown since its inception was -18.20%, smaller than the maximum QDTE drawdown of -22.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XPAY and QDTE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XPAYQDTEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.20%

-22.86%

+4.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.34%

-10.20%

+0.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.26%

-0.60%

+0.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.36%

-3.14%

+0.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.02%

2.52%

-0.50%

Volatility

XPAY vs. QDTE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF (XPAY) is 2.70%, while Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE) has a volatility of 3.72%. This indicates that XPAY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QDTE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XPAYQDTEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.70%

3.72%

-1.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.82%

11.01%

-2.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.82%

14.81%

-2.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.68%

18.42%

-1.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.68%

18.42%

-1.74%

XPAY vs. QDTE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XPAY has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than QDTE's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

XPAY vs. QDTE - Dividend Comparison

XPAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.28%, less than QDTE's 43.41% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, XPAY and QDTE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

QDTE has higher volatility (3.72%) compared to XPAY (2.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XPAY dropped -18.20% vs QDTE's -22.86%.

On 1-year performance, QDTE leads with 39.17% vs 27.57% for XPAY. On fees, XPAY is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, XPAY has been the lower-risk option at 2.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QDTE has performed better with a 39.17% return vs 27.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XPAY is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for QDTE.

QDTE has the higher dividend yield at 43.41%, compared with 20.28% for XPAY.

Their fees differ too: 0.49% for XPAY and 0.97% for QDTE.

QDTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XPAY and QDTE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer