PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XPAY vs. BUCK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XPAY vs. BUCK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF (XPAY) and Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XPAY achieves a 10.83% return, which is significantly higher than BUCK's 1.90% return.


XPAY

1D
-0.68%
1M
5.07%
YTD
10.83%
6M
10.69%
1Y
27.22%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BUCK

1D
0.02%
1M
0.38%
YTD
1.90%
6M
2.09%
1Y
7.95%
3Y*
5.27%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XPAY vs. BUCK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
XPAY
Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF
10.83%16.78%3.17%
BUCK
Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF
1.90%4.13%1.81%

Correlation

The correlation between XPAY and BUCK is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2024

0.14

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XPAY vs. BUCK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XPAY
XPAY Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
XPAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XPAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
XPAY Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
XPAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
XPAY Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

BUCK
BUCK Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
BUCK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUCK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUCK Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
BUCK Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUCK Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XPAY vs. BUCK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF (XPAY) and Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XPAYBUCKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.54

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.93

6.11

-3.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.50

32.31

-18.82

XPAY vs. BUCK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XPAY Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is comparable to the BUCK Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XPAY and BUCK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XPAYBUCKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.31

2.54

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.21

1.47

-0.26

Drawdowns

XPAY vs. BUCK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XPAY drawdown since its inception was -18.20%, which is greater than BUCK's maximum drawdown of -5.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XPAY and BUCK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XPAYBUCKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.20%

-5.43%

-12.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.34%

-1.31%

-8.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.68%

-0.04%

-0.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.37%

-0.49%

-1.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.02%

0.25%

+1.77%

Volatility

XPAY vs. BUCK - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF (XPAY) has a higher volatility of 2.76% compared to Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK) at 0.70%. This indicates that XPAY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUCK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XPAYBUCKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.76%

0.70%

+2.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.82%

1.53%

+7.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.82%

3.14%

+8.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.70%

3.49%

+13.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.70%

3.49%

+13.21%

XPAY vs. BUCK - Expense Ratio Comparison

XPAY has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than BUCK's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

XPAY vs. BUCK - Dividend Comparison

XPAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.37%, more than BUCK's 7.42% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BUCK
Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF
7.42%7.59%8.84%4.84%0.59%
XPAY
Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF
20.37%21.21%3.40%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XPAY and BUCK have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XPAY has higher volatility (2.76%) compared to BUCK (0.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XPAY dropped -18.20% vs BUCK's -5.43%.

On 1-year performance, XPAY leads with 27.22% vs 7.95% for BUCK. On fees, BUCK is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, BUCK has been the lower-risk option at 0.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XPAY has performed better with a 27.22% return vs 7.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BUCK is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for XPAY.

XPAY has the higher dividend yield at 20.37%, compared with 7.42% for BUCK.

XPAY is categorized as Derivative Income, while BUCK is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for XPAY and 0.35% for BUCK.

BUCK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XPAY and BUCK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer