XOVR vs. UFO
XOVR (ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF) and UFO (Procure Space ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XOVR is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by ERShares, while UFO is a Global Equities fund tracking the S-Network Space Index. XOVR is actively managed, while UFO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XOVR returned 3.37%/yr vs 10.61%/yr for UFO. Their 0.59 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.
Performance
XOVR vs. UFO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XOVR achieves a -4.47% return, which is significantly lower than UFO's 17.74% return.
XOVR
- 1D
- 3.44%
- 1M
- -8.38%
- 6M
- 4.57%
- YTD
- -4.47%
- 1Y
- -0.88%
- 3Y*
- 16.81%
- 5Y*
- 3.37%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.77%
UFO
- 1D
- 3.79%
- 1M
- -10.30%
- 6M
- 2.22%
- YTD
- 17.74%
- 1Y
- 54.84%
- 3Y*
- 34.13%
- 5Y*
- 10.61%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.03%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $26.10M | $26.53M | $70.91M | |
| $32.19M | $37.02M | $109.67M |
XOVR vs. UFO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XOVR ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF | -4.47% | 11.83% | 33.21% | 51.89% | -41.09% | -7.24% | 50.39% | 4.30% |
UFO Procure Space ETF | 17.74% | 67.36% | 27.22% | -2.34% | -25.85% | 7.17% | -2.15% | 5.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between XOVR and UFO is 0.59, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2019 | 0.59 |
The correlation between XOVR and UFO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.
XOVR vs. UFO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XOVR
UFO
Technology
Communication Services
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
XOVR
UFO
Communication Services
XOVR
UFO
Healthcare
XOVR
UFO
-
Financial Services
XOVR
UFO
Consumer Cyclical
XOVR
UFO
-
Industrials
XOVR
UFO
Energy
XOVR
UFO
-
Basic Materials
XOVR
-
UFO
-
Consumer Defensive
XOVR
-
UFO
-
Real Estate
XOVR
-
UFO
-
Utilities
XOVR
-
UFO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XOVR vs. UFO — Risk / Return Rank
XOVR
UFO
XOVR vs. UFO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF (XOVR) and Procure Space ETF (UFO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XOVR | UFO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.22 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.04 | 1.50 | -1.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.08 | 4.02 | -4.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XOVR vs. UFO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XOVR drawdown since its inception was -56.28%, which is greater than UFO's maximum drawdown of -50.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOVR and UFO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XOVR | UFO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.28% | -50.33% | -5.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.32% | -36.71% | +12.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.23% | -36.71% | +11.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.35% | -49.95% | +0.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.38% | -32.89% | +21.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.21% | -21.97% | +3.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.53% | 13.68% | -2.15% |
Volatility
XOVR vs. UFO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF (XOVR) is 7.84%, while Procure Space ETF (UFO) has a volatility of 8.94%. This indicates that XOVR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UFO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XOVR | UFO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.84% | 8.94% | -1.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.11% | 32.80% | -13.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.67% | 41.96% | -18.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.68% | 30.95% | -4.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.03% | 31.26% | -4.23% |
XOVR vs. UFO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XOVR and UFO have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Dividends
XOVR vs. UFO - Dividend Comparison
XOVR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UFO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UFO Procure Space ETF | 0.33% | 0.46% | 1.98% | 1.90% | 3.19% | 1.00% | 1.07% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XOVR ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 57.75% | 6.31% | 0.08% | 3.71% | 0.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XOVR and UFO have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UFO has higher volatility (8.94%) compared to XOVR (7.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XOVR dropped -56.28% vs UFO's -50.33%.
On 5-year performance, UFO leads with 10.61% vs 3.37% for XOVR. Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. On volatility, XOVR has been the lower-risk option at 7.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, UFO has performed better with a 10.61% return vs 3.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XOVR and UFO have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.
UFO has the higher dividend yield at 0.33%, compared with 0.00% for XOVR.
XOVR is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while UFO is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: ERShares and Procure.
UFO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XOVR and UFO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer