XOVR vs. NACP
XOVR (ERShares Entrepreneur Private-Public Crossover ETF) and NACP (Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - XOVR tracks the ER30TR Index while NACP tracks the Morningstar Minority Empowerment Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XOVR returned 6.16%/yr vs 15.98%/yr for NACP. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XOVR charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for NACP.
Performance
XOVR vs. NACP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XOVR achieves a -0.35% return, which is significantly lower than NACP's 22.18% return.
XOVR
- 1D
- -1.67%
- 1M
- 6.93%
- YTD
- -0.35%
- 6M
- 0.55%
- 1Y
- 10.88%
- 3Y*
- 19.21%
- 5Y*
- 6.16%
- 10Y*
- —
NACP
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 9.92%
- YTD
- 22.18%
- 6M
- 20.98%
- 1Y
- 43.81%
- 3Y*
- 27.18%
- 5Y*
- 15.98%
- 10Y*
- —
XOVR vs. NACP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XOVR ERShares Entrepreneur Private-Public Crossover ETF | -0.35% | 11.83% | 33.21% | 51.89% | -41.09% | -7.24% | 50.39% | 31.72% | -20.81% |
NACP Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF | 22.18% | 21.38% | 23.93% | 29.69% | -23.05% | 27.62% | 26.00% | 30.74% | -8.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between XOVR and NACP is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2018 | 0.75 |
The correlation between XOVR and NACP shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.82 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XOVR vs. NACP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XOVR
NACP
Technology
Communication Services
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
XOVR
NACP
Communication Services
XOVR
NACP
Healthcare
XOVR
NACP
Financial Services
XOVR
NACP
Consumer Cyclical
XOVR
NACP
Industrials
XOVR
NACP
Energy
XOVR
NACP
Basic Materials
XOVR
-
NACP
Consumer Defensive
XOVR
-
NACP
Real Estate
XOVR
-
NACP
Utilities
XOVR
-
NACP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XOVR vs. NACP — Risk / Return Rank
XOVR
NACP
XOVR vs. NACP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ERShares Entrepreneur Private-Public Crossover ETF (XOVR) and Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF (NACP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XOVR | NACP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.54 | -0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.45 | 4.56 | -4.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.00 | 20.04 | -19.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XOVR | NACP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 | 3.14 | -2.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.92 | -0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.93 | -0.54 |
Drawdowns
XOVR vs. NACP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XOVR drawdown since its inception was -56.28%, which is greater than NACP's maximum drawdown of -30.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOVR and NACP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XOVR | NACP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.28% | -30.96% | -25.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.32% | -9.65% | -14.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.23% | -19.66% | -5.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.35% | -27.89% | -21.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.55% | -0.13% | -7.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.41% | -5.75% | -12.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.94% | 2.19% | +8.75% |
Volatility
XOVR vs. NACP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ERShares Entrepreneur Private-Public Crossover ETF (XOVR) is 4.20%, while Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF (NACP) has a volatility of 4.44%. This indicates that XOVR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NACP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XOVR | NACP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.20% | 4.44% | -0.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.81% | 11.13% | +3.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.00% | 14.02% | +5.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.15% | 17.47% | +8.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.87% | 18.70% | +8.17% |
XOVR vs. NACP - Expense Ratio Comparison
XOVR has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than NACP's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
XOVR vs. NACP - Dividend Comparison
XOVR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NACP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NACP Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF | 0.55% | 0.62% | 2.96% | 1.28% | 3.48% | 3.06% | 1.48% | 1.22% | 0.71% | 0.00% |
XOVR ERShares Entrepreneur Private-Public Crossover ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 57.75% | 6.31% | 0.08% | 3.71% | 0.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XOVR and NACP have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NACP has higher volatility (4.44%) compared to XOVR (4.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XOVR dropped -56.28% vs NACP's -30.96%.
On 5-year performance, NACP leads with 15.98% vs 6.16% for XOVR. On fees, NACP is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, XOVR has been the lower-risk option at 4.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, NACP has performed better with a 15.98% return vs 6.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NACP is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for XOVR.
NACP has the higher dividend yield at 0.55%, compared with 0.00% for XOVR.
XOVR tracks ER30TR Index, while NACP tracks Morningstar Minority Empowerment Index. They also come from different issuers: EntrepreneurShares and Impact Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for XOVR and 0.49% for NACP.
NACP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.14 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XOVR and NACP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer