PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XOUT vs. NVDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XOUT vs. NVDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF (XOUT) and GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XOUT achieves a -3.24% return, which is significantly lower than NVDL's 19.95% return.


XOUT

1D
-2.27%
1M
9.28%
YTD
-3.24%
6M
-4.85%
1Y
8.51%
3Y*
18.88%
5Y*
10.93%
10Y*

NVDL

1D
-7.15%
1M
14.24%
YTD
19.95%
6M
27.27%
1Y
84.82%
3Y*
109.72%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XOUT vs. NVDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XOUT
GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF
-3.24%18.18%23.11%42.32%-5.79%
NVDL
GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF
19.95%32.57%344.58%432.18%-28.32%

Correlation

The correlation between XOUT and NVDL is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2022

0.58

The correlation between XOUT and NVDL shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (1 year) to 0.58 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XOUT vs. NVDL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XOUT
NVDL

Technology

35.1%

-

Healthcare

17.3%

-

Consumer Cyclical

15.4%

-

Communication Services

12.4%

-

Financial Services

9.6%
100.0%

Consumer Defensive

5.7%

-

Industrials

3.3%

-

Basic Materials

0.6%

-

Real Estate

0.4%

-

Energy

0.2%

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

XOUT
35.1%
NVDL

-

Healthcare

XOUT
17.3%
NVDL

-

Consumer Cyclical

XOUT
15.4%
NVDL

-

Communication Services

XOUT
12.4%
NVDL

-

Financial Services

XOUT
9.6%
NVDL
100.0%

Consumer Defensive

XOUT
5.7%
NVDL

-

Industrials

XOUT
3.3%
NVDL

-

Basic Materials

XOUT
0.6%
NVDL

-

Real Estate

XOUT
0.4%
NVDL

-

Energy

XOUT
0.2%
NVDL

-

Utilities

XOUT

-

NVDL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XOUT vs. NVDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XOUT
XOUT Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
XOUT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XOUT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
XOUT Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
XOUT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
XOUT Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDL
NVDL Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
NVDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDL Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDL Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XOUT vs. NVDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF (XOUT) and GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XOUTNVDLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.23

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.37

2.02

-1.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.92

4.63

-3.71

XOUT vs. NVDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XOUT Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is lower than the NVDL Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XOUT and NVDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XOUTNVDLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

1.25

-0.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

1.77

-1.10

Drawdowns

XOUT vs. NVDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XOUT drawdown since its inception was -31.29%, smaller than the maximum NVDL drawdown of -67.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOUT and NVDL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XOUTNVDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.29%

-67.55%

+36.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.21%

-42.23%

+19.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.77%

-67.55%

+43.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.09%

-18.19%

+12.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.41%

-16.96%

+8.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.25%

18.39%

-9.14%

Volatility

XOUT vs. NVDL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF (XOUT) is 7.48%, while GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDL) has a volatility of 24.77%. This indicates that XOUT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XOUTNVDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.48%

24.77%

-17.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.17%

50.80%

-34.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.55%

68.20%

-48.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.78%

90.43%

-68.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.23%

90.43%

-67.20%

XOUT vs. NVDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

XOUT has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than NVDL's 1.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

XOUT vs. NVDL - Dividend Comparison

Neither XOUT nor NVDL has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
NVDL
GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%11.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XOUT
GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.40%0.51%0.28%0.53%0.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


XOUT and NVDL have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NVDL has higher volatility (24.77%) compared to XOUT (7.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XOUT dropped -31.29% vs NVDL's -67.55%.

On 3-year performance, NVDL leads with 109.72% vs 18.88% for XOUT. On fees, XOUT is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, XOUT has been the lower-risk option at 7.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, NVDL has performed better with a 109.72% return vs 18.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XOUT is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for NVDL.

XOUT and NVDL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

XOUT is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while NVDL is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for XOUT and 1.15% for NVDL.

NVDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XOUT and NVDL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer