XOUT vs. ACSI
XOUT (GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF) and ACSI (American Customer Satisfaction ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - XOUT tracks the XOUT U.S. Large Cap Index while ACSI tracks the American Customer Satisfaction Investable Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XOUT returned 10.93%/yr vs 9.12%/yr for ACSI. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XOUT charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for ACSI.
Performance
XOUT vs. ACSI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XOUT achieves a -3.24% return, which is significantly lower than ACSI's 9.66% return.
XOUT
- 1D
- -2.27%
- 1M
- 9.28%
- YTD
- -3.24%
- 6M
- -4.85%
- 1Y
- 8.51%
- 3Y*
- 18.88%
- 5Y*
- 10.93%
- 10Y*
- —
ACSI
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- 5.55%
- YTD
- 9.66%
- 6M
- 9.77%
- 1Y
- 18.71%
- 3Y*
- 18.51%
- 5Y*
- 9.12%
- 10Y*
- —
XOUT vs. ACSI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XOUT GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF | -3.24% | 18.18% | 23.11% | 42.32% | -28.18% | 26.13% | 28.71% | 11.32% |
ACSI American Customer Satisfaction ETF | 9.66% | 10.70% | 22.51% | 21.06% | -20.93% | 23.33% | 22.93% | 7.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between XOUT and ACSI is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2019 | 0.79 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XOUT and ACSI has dropped to 0.55 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
XOUT vs. ACSI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XOUT
ACSI
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Energy
Utilities
-
Technology
XOUT
ACSI
Healthcare
XOUT
ACSI
Consumer Cyclical
XOUT
ACSI
Communication Services
XOUT
ACSI
Financial Services
XOUT
ACSI
Consumer Defensive
XOUT
ACSI
Industrials
XOUT
ACSI
Basic Materials
XOUT
ACSI
-
Real Estate
XOUT
ACSI
-
Energy
XOUT
ACSI
Utilities
XOUT
-
ACSI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XOUT vs. ACSI — Risk / Return Rank
XOUT
ACSI
XOUT vs. ACSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF (XOUT) and American Customer Satisfaction ETF (ACSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XOUT | ACSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.29 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.37 | 2.42 | -2.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.92 | 9.45 | -8.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XOUT | ACSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 | 1.63 | -1.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.55 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.75 | -0.08 |
Drawdowns
XOUT vs. ACSI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XOUT drawdown since its inception was -31.29%, smaller than the maximum ACSI drawdown of -34.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOUT and ACSI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XOUT | ACSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.29% | -34.49% | +3.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.21% | -7.76% | -15.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.77% | -15.27% | -8.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.29% | -24.86% | -6.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.09% | -2.38% | -3.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.41% | -5.39% | -3.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.25% | 1.98% | +7.27% |
Volatility
XOUT vs. ACSI - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF (XOUT) has a higher volatility of 7.48% compared to American Customer Satisfaction ETF (ACSI) at 4.16%. This indicates that XOUT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACSI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XOUT | ACSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.48% | 4.16% | +3.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.17% | 8.88% | +7.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.55% | 11.56% | +7.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.78% | 16.66% | +5.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.23% | 17.43% | +5.80% |
XOUT vs. ACSI - Expense Ratio Comparison
XOUT has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than ACSI's 0.66% expense ratio.
Dividends
XOUT vs. ACSI - Dividend Comparison
XOUT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ACSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACSI American Customer Satisfaction ETF | 0.83% | 0.91% | 0.69% | 1.01% | 0.81% | 0.31% | 0.82% | 1.64% | 1.59% | 1.20% | 0.18% |
XOUT GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.40% | 0.51% | 0.28% | 0.53% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XOUT and ACSI have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XOUT has higher volatility (7.48%) compared to ACSI (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XOUT dropped -31.29% vs ACSI's -34.49%.
On 5-year performance, XOUT leads with 10.93% vs 9.12% for ACSI. On fees, XOUT is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, ACSI has been the lower-risk option at 4.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, XOUT has performed better with a 10.93% return vs 9.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XOUT is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for ACSI.
ACSI has the higher dividend yield at 0.83%, compared with 0.00% for XOUT.
XOUT tracks XOUT U.S. Large Cap Index, while ACSI tracks American Customer Satisfaction Investable Index. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Exponential ETFs. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for XOUT and 0.66% for ACSI.
ACSI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XOUT and ACSI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer