XOP vs. GLDM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XOP (SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF) and GLDM (SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - XOP is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry, while GLDM is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XOP returned 14.86%/yr vs 18.49%/yr for GLDM. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XOP charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for GLDM.

Performance

XOP vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XOP achieves a 36.08% return, which is significantly higher than GLDM's 3.00% return.

XOP

• 1D: 1.35%
• 1M: -5.46%
• YTD: 36.08%
• 6M: 26.81%
• 1Y: 41.73%
• 3Y*: 14.10%
• 5Y*: 14.86%
• 10Y*: 3.80%

GLDM

• 1D: -0.96%
• 1M: -1.62%
• YTD: 3.00%
• 6M: 5.60%
• 1Y: 32.42%
• 3Y*: 31.49%
• 5Y*: 18.49%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XOP vs. GLDM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
XOP SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF	36.08%	-2.15%	-1.00%	3.56%	45.37%	66.74%	-36.40%	-9.44%	-37.27%
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust	3.00%	64.20%	27.08%	13.04%	-0.47%	-4.01%	25.10%	18.10%	1.84%

Correlation

The correlation between XOP and GLDM is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.02
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.11
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2018	0.06

The correlation between XOP and GLDM shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.13 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XOP vs. GLDM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XOP	GLDM
Energy	97.2%	-
Basic Materials	2.9%	100.0%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

XOP vs. GLDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XOP

XOP Risk / Return Rank: 43
XOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
XOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
XOP Omega Ratio Rank: 37
XOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
XOP Martin Ratio Rank: 43

GLDM

GLDM Risk / Return Rank: 32
GLDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
GLDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
GLDM Omega Ratio Rank: 36
GLDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
GLDM Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XOP vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XOP	GLDM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.51	1.24	+0.28
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.00	1.63	+0.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.25	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.77	1.70	+1.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.10	4.23	+2.87
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XOP vs. GLDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XOP Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is comparable to the GLDM Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XOP and GLDM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XOP	GLDM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.51	1.24	+0.28
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.44	1.04	-0.60
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.09	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.06	1.02	-0.95

Drawdowns

XOP vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XOP drawdown since its inception was -90.27%, which is greater than GLDM's maximum drawdown of -21.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOP and GLDM.

Drawdown Indicators

	XOP	GLDM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-90.27%	-21.63%	-68.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.14%	-19.14%	+4.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-34.98%	-19.14%	-15.84%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.98%	-20.92%	-14.06%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-82.61%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-36.40%	-17.65%	-18.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-42.59%	-6.22%	-36.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.90%	7.69%	-1.79%

Volatility

XOP vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP) has a higher volatility of 10.03% compared to SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) at 5.47%. This indicates that XOP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XOP	GLDM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.03%	5.47%	+4.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.64%	22.99%	-1.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.81%	26.39%	+1.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.88%	17.91%	+15.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.28%	16.85%	+23.43%

XOP vs. GLDM - Expense Ratio Comparison

XOP has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDM's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

XOP vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison

XOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%, while GLDM has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XOP SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF	1.90%	2.62%	2.45%	2.63%	2.47%	1.61%	2.34%	1.47%	0.99%	0.76%	0.76%	2.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XOP and GLDM in my portfolio?

XOP and GLDM have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XOP or GLDM?

XOP has higher volatility (10.03%) compared to GLDM (5.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XOP dropped -90.27% vs GLDM's -21.63%.

Which ETF is better, XOP or GLDM?

On 5-year performance, GLDM leads with 18.49% vs 14.86% for XOP. On fees, GLDM is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, GLDM has been the lower-risk option at 5.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XOP or GLDM?

Over the 5-year period, GLDM has performed better with a 18.49% return vs 14.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XOP or GLDM?

GLDM is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XOP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XOP or GLDM?

XOP has the higher dividend yield at 1.90%, compared with 0.00% for GLDM.

What is the main difference between XOP and GLDM?

XOP is categorized as Energy Equities, while GLDM is Gold. XOP tracks S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry, while GLDM tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XOP and 0.10% for GLDM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XOP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.