XOP vs. FLMI
XOP (SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF) and FLMI (Franklin Liberty Federal Intermediate Tax-Free Bond Opportunities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XOP is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry, while FLMI is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton. XOP is passively managed, while FLMI is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, XOP returned 19.29%/yr vs 1.67%/yr for FLMI. Their -0.09 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. XOP charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for FLMI.
Performance
XOP vs. FLMI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XOP achieves a 41.76% return, which is significantly higher than FLMI's 1.14% return.
XOP
- 1D
- 1.45%
- 1M
- 14.72%
- 6M
- 27.63%
- YTD
- 41.76%
- 1Y
- 46.74%
- 3Y*
- 10.13%
- 5Y*
- 19.29%
- 10Y*
- 5.00%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.68%
FLMI
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.79%
- 6M
- 0.18%
- YTD
- 1.14%
- 1Y
- 5.98%
- 3Y*
- 5.21%
- 5Y*
- 1.67%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.86%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $14.73M | $15.20M | $18.23M | |
| $553.31M | $544.38M | $598.08M |
XOP vs. FLMI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XOP SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF | 41.76% | -2.15% | -1.00% | 3.56% | 45.37% | 66.74% | -36.40% | -9.44% | -28.10% | 21.96% |
FLMI Franklin Liberty Federal Intermediate Tax-Free Bond Opportunities ETF | 1.14% | 5.89% | 4.91% | 7.89% | -10.23% | 4.06% | 6.11% | 6.71% | 0.29% | -0.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between XOP and FLMI is -0.34, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2017 | -0.09 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between XOP and FLMI has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.09 to -0.34, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XOP vs. FLMI — Risk / Return Rank
XOP
FLMI
XOP vs. FLMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP) and Franklin Liberty Federal Intermediate Tax-Free Bond Opportunities ETF (FLMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XOP | FLMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.50 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.26 | 2.37 | -0.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.48 | 8.11 | -2.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XOP vs. FLMI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XOP drawdown since its inception was -90.27%, which is greater than FLMI's maximum drawdown of -14.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOP and FLMI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XOP | FLMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.27% | -14.66% | -75.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.50% | -2.90% | -15.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.98% | -4.66% | -30.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.98% | -14.66% | -20.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -82.61% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.74% | -1.79% | -31.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.56% | -2.78% | -39.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.67% | 0.84% | +6.83% |
Volatility
XOP vs. FLMI - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP) has a higher volatility of 8.28% compared to Franklin Liberty Federal Intermediate Tax-Free Bond Opportunities ETF (FLMI) at 1.04%. This indicates that XOP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XOP | FLMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.28% | 1.04% | +7.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.52% | 2.30% | +20.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.49% | 3.03% | +25.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.53% | 4.45% | +29.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.15% | 4.70% | +35.45% |
XOP vs. FLMI - Expense Ratio Comparison
XOP has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than FLMI's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
XOP vs. FLMI - Dividend Comparison
XOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, less than FLMI's 3.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLMI Franklin Liberty Federal Intermediate Tax-Free Bond Opportunities ETF | 3.59% | 3.89% | 4.08% | 3.71% | 3.08% | 2.22% | 2.09% | 2.71% | 2.41% | 0.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XOP SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF | 1.83% | 2.62% | 2.45% | 2.63% | 2.47% | 1.61% | 2.34% | 1.47% | 0.99% | 0.76% | 0.76% | 2.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XOP and FLMI have a correlation of -0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XOP has higher volatility (8.28%) compared to FLMI (1.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XOP dropped -90.27% vs FLMI's -14.66%.
On 5-year performance, XOP leads with 19.29% vs 1.67% for FLMI. On fees, FLMI is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, FLMI has been the lower-risk option at 1.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, XOP has performed better with a 19.29% return vs 1.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLMI is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XOP.
FLMI has the higher dividend yield at 3.59%, compared with 1.83% for XOP.
XOP is categorized as Energy Equities, while FLMI is Municipal Bonds. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XOP and 0.30% for FLMI.
FLMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XOP and FLMI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer