XOP vs. AMSC

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

XOP (SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF) is Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry, while AMSC (American Superconductor Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, XOP returned 5.00%/yr vs 12.68%/yr for AMSC. Their 0.33 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.

Performance

XOP vs. AMSC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP) and American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XOP achieves a 41.76% return, which is significantly higher than AMSC's 2.05% return. Over the past 10 years, XOP has underperformed AMSC with an annualized return of 5.00%, while AMSC has yielded a comparatively higher 12.68% annualized return.

XOP

• 1D: 1.45%
• 1M: 15.38%
• 6M: 27.63%
• YTD: 41.76%
• 1Y: 41.65%
• 3Y*: 10.13%
• 5Y*: 19.29%
• 10Y*: 5.00%
• ALL TIME*: 2.68%

AMSC

• 1D: -0.27%
• 1M: -26.43%
• 6M: -1.84%
• YTD: 2.05%
• 1Y: -48.34%
• 3Y*: 22.11%
• 5Y*: 15.89%
• 10Y*: 12.68%
• ALL TIME*: -3.05%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AMSC American Superconductor Corporation	$27.27M	$25.36M	$48.11M
XOP SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF	$553.31M	$544.38M	$598.08M

XOP vs. AMSC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XOP SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF	41.76%	-2.15%	-1.00%	3.56%	45.37%	66.74%	-36.40%	-9.44%	-28.10%	-9.47%
AMSC American Superconductor Corporation	2.05%	16.85%	121.10%	202.72%	-66.18%	-53.54%	198.34%	-29.60%	207.16%	-50.75%

Correlation

The correlation between XOP and AMSC is -0.00, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.00
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.14
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.22
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.27
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2006	0.33

The correlation between XOP and AMSC shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.33 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

XOP vs. AMSC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XOP

XOP Risk / Return Rank: 58
XOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
XOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
XOP Omega Ratio Rank: 56
XOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
XOP Martin Ratio Rank: 48

AMSC

AMSC Risk / Return Rank: 18
AMSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
AMSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
AMSC Omega Ratio Rank: 22
AMSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
AMSC Martin Ratio Rank: 15

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XOP vs. AMSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP) and American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XOP	AMSC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.47	-0.59	+2.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.96	-0.47	+2.43
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	0.94	+0.30
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.26	-0.79	+3.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.48	-1.21	+6.68

XOP vs. AMSC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XOP Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is higher than the AMSC Sharpe Ratio of -0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XOP and AMSC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XOP vs. AMSC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XOP drawdown since its inception was -90.27%, smaller than the maximum AMSC drawdown of -99.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOP and AMSC.

Drawdown Indicators

	XOP	AMSC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-90.27%	-99.57%	+9.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.50%	-61.08%	+42.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-34.98%	-61.08%	+26.10%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.98%	-82.94%	+47.96%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-82.61%	-89.06%	+6.45%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-33.74%	-95.76%	+62.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-42.56%	-75.83%	+33.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.67%	40.10%	-32.43%

Volatility

XOP vs. AMSC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP) is 8.28%, while American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) has a volatility of 22.38%. This indicates that XOP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMSC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XOP	AMSC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.28%	22.38%	-14.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.52%	57.61%	-35.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.49%	87.44%	-58.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.53%	87.66%	-54.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.15%	79.49%	-39.34%

Dividends

XOP vs. AMSC - Dividend Comparison

XOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, while AMSC has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AMSC American Superconductor Corporation	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XOP SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF	1.83%	2.62%	2.45%	2.63%	2.47%	1.61%	2.34%	1.47%	0.99%	0.76%	0.76%	2.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XOP and AMSC in my portfolio?

XOP and AMSC have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XOP or AMSC?

AMSC has higher volatility (22.38%) compared to XOP (8.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XOP dropped -90.27% vs AMSC's -99.57%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XOP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.