PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XONE vs. TLT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XONE vs. TLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BondBloxx Bloomberg One Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XONE) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XONE achieves a 1.16% return, which is significantly higher than TLT's -0.05% return.


XONE

1D
0.04%
1M
0.23%
YTD
1.16%
6M
1.52%
1Y
3.81%
3Y*
4.55%
5Y*
10Y*

TLT

1D
0.22%
1M
0.48%
YTD
-0.05%
6M
-1.27%
1Y
3.48%
3Y*
-1.67%
5Y*
-6.27%
10Y*
-1.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XONE vs. TLT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XONE
BondBloxx Bloomberg One Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF
1.16%4.41%4.83%4.74%0.60%
TLT
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
-0.05%4.25%-8.05%2.77%-6.90%

Correlation

The correlation between XONE and TLT is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2022

0.49

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XONE vs. TLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XONE
XONE Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
XONE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XONE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
XONE Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
XONE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
XONE Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

TLT
TLT Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
TLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLT Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
TLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLT Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XONE vs. TLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx Bloomberg One Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XONE) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XONETLTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+6.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+16.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

3.55

1.07

+2.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

23.89

0.46

+23.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

138.39

1.14

+137.25

XONE vs. TLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XONE Sharpe Ratio is 7.03, which is higher than the TLT Sharpe Ratio of 0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XONE and TLT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XONETLTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.03

0.36

+6.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

4.97

0.26

+4.71

Drawdowns

XONE vs. TLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XONE drawdown since its inception was -0.40%, smaller than the maximum TLT drawdown of -48.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XONE and TLT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XONETLTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.40%

-48.35%

+47.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.16%

-7.58%

+7.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.28%

-19.18%

+18.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-40.31%

+40.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.04%

-13.82%

+13.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.03%

3.05%

-3.02%

Volatility

XONE vs. TLT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BondBloxx Bloomberg One Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XONE) is 0.09%, while iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) has a volatility of 2.71%. This indicates that XONE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XONETLTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.09%

2.71%

-2.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.34%

6.50%

-6.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55%

9.77%

-9.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.86%

15.86%

-15.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.86%

14.90%

-14.04%

XONE vs. TLT - Expense Ratio Comparison

XONE has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than TLT's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XONE vs. TLT - Dividend Comparison

XONE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.06%, less than TLT's 4.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TLT
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
4.58%4.43%4.30%3.38%2.67%1.50%1.50%2.27%2.63%2.43%2.60%2.61%
XONE
BondBloxx Bloomberg One Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF
4.06%4.33%5.21%4.46%1.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XONE and TLT have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TLT has higher volatility (2.71%) compared to XONE (0.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XONE dropped -0.40% vs TLT's -48.35%.

On 3-year performance, XONE leads with 4.55% vs -1.67% for TLT. On fees, XONE is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, XONE has been the lower-risk option at 0.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, XONE has performed better with a 4.55% return vs -1.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XONE is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for TLT.

TLT has the higher dividend yield at 4.58%, compared with 4.06% for XONE.

XONE tracks Bloomberg US Treasury 1 Year Target Duration Index, while TLT tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: BondBloxx and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for XONE and 0.15% for TLT.

XONE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.03 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XONE and TLT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer