XOEX vs. SNPG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XOEX (Xtrackers S&P 100 Ex Top 20 ETF) and SNPG (Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth ESG ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XOEX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P 100 Ex-Top 20 Select Index, while SNPG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth ESG Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XOEX returned 18.33%/yr vs 25.13%/yr for SNPG. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.15% expense ratio.

Performance

XOEX vs. SNPG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers S&P 100 Ex Top 20 ETF (XOEX) and Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth ESG ETF (SNPG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XOEX achieves a 9.69% return, which is significantly lower than SNPG's 10.73% return.

XOEX

• 1D: -0.53%
• 1M: 6.34%
• YTD: 9.69%
• 6M: 10.33%
• 1Y: 28.12%
• 3Y*: 18.33%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SNPG

• 1D: -0.39%
• 1M: 10.11%
• YTD: 10.73%
• 6M: 11.17%
• 1Y: 29.55%
• 3Y*: 25.13%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XOEX vs. SNPG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
XOEX Xtrackers S&P 100 Ex Top 20 ETF	9.69%	18.97%	12.07%	15.99%	2.98%
SNPG Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth ESG ETF	10.73%	18.22%	33.99%	38.45%	1.81%

Correlation

The correlation between XOEX and SNPG is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2022	0.66

The correlation between XOEX and SNPG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

XOEX vs. SNPG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XOEX	SNPG
Technology	26.7%	36.1%
Healthcare	16.7%	9.6%
Financial Services	15.5%	12.8%
Industrials	14.6%	10.5%
Consumer Defensive	7.7%	0.0%
Communication Services	5.1%	19.4%
Consumer Cyclical	4.8%	9.4%
Energy	3.4%	0.0%
Utilities	2.6%	0.0%
Basic Materials	1.7%	1.1%
Real Estate	1.1%	2.2%

Return for Risk

XOEX vs. SNPG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XOEX

XOEX Risk / Return Rank: 80
XOEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
XOEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
XOEX Omega Ratio Rank: 78
XOEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
XOEX Martin Ratio Rank: 79

SNPG

SNPG Risk / Return Rank: 58
SNPG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
SNPG Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
SNPG Omega Ratio Rank: 61
SNPG Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
SNPG Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XOEX vs. SNPG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 100 Ex Top 20 ETF (XOEX) and Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth ESG ETF (SNPG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XOEX	SNPG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.58	2.11	+0.47
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.70	3.01	+0.69
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.37	+0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.86	2.26	+1.60
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	15.43	9.39	+6.03
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XOEX vs. SNPG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XOEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is comparable to the SNPG Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XOEX and SNPG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XOEX	SNPG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.58	2.11	+0.47
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.27	1.62	-0.35

Drawdowns

XOEX vs. SNPG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XOEX drawdown since its inception was -14.68%, smaller than the maximum SNPG drawdown of -21.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOEX and SNPG.

Drawdown Indicators

	XOEX	SNPG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.68%	-21.69%	+7.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.31%	-13.12%	+5.81%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.68%	-21.69%	+7.01%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.53%	-0.39%	-0.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.65%	-2.54%	-0.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.83%	3.15%	-1.32%

Volatility

XOEX vs. SNPG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers S&P 100 Ex Top 20 ETF (XOEX) is 3.18%, while Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth ESG ETF (SNPG) has a volatility of 4.80%. This indicates that XOEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SNPG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XOEX	SNPG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.18%	4.80%	-1.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.30%	11.43%	-3.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.96%	14.05%	-3.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.42%	18.01%	-4.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.42%	18.01%	-4.59%

XOEX vs. SNPG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XOEX and SNPG have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XOEX vs. SNPG - Dividend Comparison

XOEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, more than SNPG's 0.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
SNPG Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth ESG ETF	0.46%	0.49%	0.57%	0.95%	0.20%
XOEX Xtrackers S&P 100 Ex Top 20 ETF	1.60%	1.95%	2.09%	1.72%	0.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XOEX and SNPG in my portfolio?

XOEX and SNPG have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XOEX or SNPG?

SNPG has higher volatility (4.80%) compared to XOEX (3.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XOEX dropped -14.68% vs SNPG's -21.69%.

Which ETF is better, XOEX or SNPG?

On 3-year performance, SNPG leads with 25.13% vs 18.33% for XOEX. Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. On volatility, XOEX has been the lower-risk option at 3.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XOEX or SNPG?

Over the 3-year period, SNPG has performed better with a 25.13% return vs 18.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XOEX or SNPG?

XOEX and SNPG have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XOEX or SNPG?

XOEX has the higher dividend yield at 1.60%, compared with 0.46% for SNPG.

What is the main difference between XOEX and SNPG?

XOEX is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while SNPG is Large Cap Growth Equities. XOEX tracks S&P 100 Ex-Top 20 Select Index, while SNPG tracks S&P 500 Growth ESG Index.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XOEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.