XOEX vs. DBJP
XOEX (Xtrackers S&P 100 Ex Top 20 ETF) and DBJP (Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XOEX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P 100 Ex-Top 20 Select Index, while DBJP is a Japan Equities fund tracking the MSCI Japan US Dollar Hedged Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XOEX returned 18.33%/yr vs 29.04%/yr for DBJP. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XOEX charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for DBJP.
Performance
XOEX vs. DBJP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XOEX achieves a 9.69% return, which is significantly lower than DBJP's 20.51% return.
XOEX
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 6.34%
- YTD
- 9.69%
- 6M
- 10.33%
- 1Y
- 28.12%
- 3Y*
- 18.33%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DBJP
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- 8.88%
- YTD
- 20.51%
- 6M
- 24.02%
- 1Y
- 52.66%
- 3Y*
- 29.04%
- 5Y*
- 21.44%
- 10Y*
- 16.54%
XOEX vs. DBJP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XOEX Xtrackers S&P 100 Ex Top 20 ETF | 9.69% | 18.97% | 12.07% | 15.99% | 2.98% |
DBJP Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF | 20.51% | 29.51% | 25.53% | 36.21% | -4.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between XOEX and DBJP is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2022 | 0.51 |
The correlation between XOEX and DBJP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
XOEX vs. DBJP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XOEX
DBJP
Technology
Healthcare
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
XOEX
DBJP
Healthcare
XOEX
DBJP
Financial Services
XOEX
DBJP
Industrials
XOEX
DBJP
Consumer Defensive
XOEX
DBJP
Communication Services
XOEX
DBJP
Consumer Cyclical
XOEX
DBJP
Energy
XOEX
DBJP
Utilities
XOEX
DBJP
Basic Materials
XOEX
DBJP
Real Estate
XOEX
DBJP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XOEX vs. DBJP — Risk / Return Rank
XOEX
DBJP
XOEX vs. DBJP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 100 Ex Top 20 ETF (XOEX) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XOEX | DBJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.58 | 2.83 | -0.25 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.70 | 3.89 | -0.19 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.51 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.86 | 5.09 | -1.23 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.43 | 19.86 | -4.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XOEX | DBJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.58 | 2.83 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.14 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.27 | 0.68 | +0.59 |
Drawdowns
XOEX vs. DBJP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XOEX drawdown since its inception was -14.68%, smaller than the maximum DBJP drawdown of -31.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOEX and DBJP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XOEX | DBJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.68% | -31.30% | +16.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.31% | -10.39% | +3.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.68% | -21.50% | +6.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.53% | 0.00% | -0.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.65% | -7.29% | +4.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.83% | 2.66% | -0.83% |
Volatility
XOEX vs. DBJP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers S&P 100 Ex Top 20 ETF (XOEX) is 3.18%, while Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP) has a volatility of 3.85%. This indicates that XOEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBJP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XOEX | DBJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.18% | 3.85% | -0.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.30% | 13.79% | -5.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.96% | 18.69% | -7.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.42% | 18.93% | -5.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.42% | 19.46% | -6.04% |
XOEX vs. DBJP - Expense Ratio Comparison
XOEX has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than DBJP's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
XOEX vs. DBJP - Dividend Comparison
XOEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, less than DBJP's 2.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBJP Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF | 2.34% | 2.81% | 2.80% | 5.21% | 0.80% | 2.30% | 2.53% | 2.56% | 3.87% | 2.07% | 1.13% | 5.95% |
XOEX Xtrackers S&P 100 Ex Top 20 ETF | 1.60% | 1.95% | 2.09% | 1.72% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XOEX and DBJP have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBJP has higher volatility (3.85%) compared to XOEX (3.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XOEX dropped -14.68% vs DBJP's -31.30%.
On 3-year performance, DBJP leads with 29.04% vs 18.33% for XOEX. On fees, XOEX is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, XOEX has been the lower-risk option at 3.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DBJP has performed better with a 29.04% return vs 18.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XOEX is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for DBJP.
DBJP has the higher dividend yield at 2.34%, compared with 1.60% for XOEX.
XOEX is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while DBJP is Japan Equities. XOEX tracks S&P 100 Ex-Top 20 Select Index, while DBJP tracks MSCI Japan US Dollar Hedged Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for XOEX and 0.45% for DBJP.
DBJP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.83 vs 2.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XOEX and DBJP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer