PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XOEX vs. DBJP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XOEX vs. DBJP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers S&P 100 Ex Top 20 ETF (XOEX) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XOEX achieves a 9.69% return, which is significantly lower than DBJP's 20.51% return.


XOEX

1D
-0.53%
1M
6.34%
YTD
9.69%
6M
10.33%
1Y
28.12%
3Y*
18.33%
5Y*
10Y*

DBJP

1D
0.81%
1M
8.88%
YTD
20.51%
6M
24.02%
1Y
52.66%
3Y*
29.04%
5Y*
21.44%
10Y*
16.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XOEX vs. DBJP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XOEX
Xtrackers S&P 100 Ex Top 20 ETF
9.69%18.97%12.07%15.99%2.98%
DBJP
Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF
20.51%29.51%25.53%36.21%-4.04%

Correlation

The correlation between XOEX and DBJP is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2022

0.51

The correlation between XOEX and DBJP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

XOEX vs. DBJP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XOEX
DBJP

Technology

26.7%
19.1%

Healthcare

16.7%
6.3%

Financial Services

15.5%
17.5%

Industrials

14.6%
26.0%

Consumer Defensive

7.7%
3.6%

Communication Services

5.1%
7.9%

Consumer Cyclical

4.8%
12.2%

Energy

3.4%
1.1%

Utilities

2.6%
1.1%

Basic Materials

1.7%
3.0%

Real Estate

1.1%
2.3%

Technology

XOEX
26.7%
DBJP
19.1%

Healthcare

XOEX
16.7%
DBJP
6.3%

Financial Services

XOEX
15.5%
DBJP
17.5%

Industrials

XOEX
14.6%
DBJP
26.0%

Consumer Defensive

XOEX
7.7%
DBJP
3.6%

Communication Services

XOEX
5.1%
DBJP
7.9%

Consumer Cyclical

XOEX
4.8%
DBJP
12.2%

Energy

XOEX
3.4%
DBJP
1.1%

Utilities

XOEX
2.6%
DBJP
1.1%

Basic Materials

XOEX
1.7%
DBJP
3.0%

Real Estate

XOEX
1.1%
DBJP
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XOEX vs. DBJP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XOEX
XOEX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
XOEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XOEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
XOEX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
XOEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
XOEX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

DBJP
DBJP Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
DBJP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBJP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBJP Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
DBJP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBJP Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XOEX vs. DBJP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 100 Ex Top 20 ETF (XOEX) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XOEXDBJPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.58

2.83

-0.25

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.70

3.89

-0.19

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.51

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.86

5.09

-1.23

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.43

19.86

-4.43

XOEX vs. DBJP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XOEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is comparable to the DBJP Sharpe Ratio of 2.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XOEX and DBJP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XOEXDBJPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.58

2.83

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.27

0.68

+0.59

Drawdowns

XOEX vs. DBJP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XOEX drawdown since its inception was -14.68%, smaller than the maximum DBJP drawdown of -31.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOEX and DBJP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XOEXDBJPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.68%

-31.30%

+16.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.31%

-10.39%

+3.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.68%

-21.50%

+6.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.53%

0.00%

-0.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.65%

-7.29%

+4.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.83%

2.66%

-0.83%

Volatility

XOEX vs. DBJP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers S&P 100 Ex Top 20 ETF (XOEX) is 3.18%, while Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP) has a volatility of 3.85%. This indicates that XOEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBJP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XOEXDBJPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.18%

3.85%

-0.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.30%

13.79%

-5.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.96%

18.69%

-7.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.42%

18.93%

-5.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.42%

19.46%

-6.04%

XOEX vs. DBJP - Expense Ratio Comparison

XOEX has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than DBJP's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

XOEX vs. DBJP - Dividend Comparison

XOEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, less than DBJP's 2.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBJP
Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF
2.34%2.81%2.80%5.21%0.80%2.30%2.53%2.56%3.87%2.07%1.13%5.95%
XOEX
Xtrackers S&P 100 Ex Top 20 ETF
1.60%1.95%2.09%1.72%0.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XOEX and DBJP have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBJP has higher volatility (3.85%) compared to XOEX (3.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XOEX dropped -14.68% vs DBJP's -31.30%.

On 3-year performance, DBJP leads with 29.04% vs 18.33% for XOEX. On fees, XOEX is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, XOEX has been the lower-risk option at 3.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DBJP has performed better with a 29.04% return vs 18.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XOEX is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for DBJP.

DBJP has the higher dividend yield at 2.34%, compared with 1.60% for XOEX.

XOEX is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while DBJP is Japan Equities. XOEX tracks S&P 100 Ex-Top 20 Select Index, while DBJP tracks MSCI Japan US Dollar Hedged Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for XOEX and 0.45% for DBJP.

DBJP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.83 vs 2.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XOEX and DBJP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer