PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XOEF vs. IBID
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XOEF vs. IBID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF (XOEF) and iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XOEF achieves a 16.44% return, which is significantly higher than IBID's 2.07% return.


XOEF

1D
0.79%
1M
3.14%
YTD
16.44%
6M
15.13%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IBID

1D
0.13%
1M
-0.21%
YTD
2.07%
6M
2.04%
1Y
3.96%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XOEF vs. IBID - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XOEF and IBID is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025

-0.07

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XOEF vs. IBID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XOEF

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


IBID
IBID Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
IBID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBID Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBID Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
IBID Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBID Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XOEF vs. IBID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF (XOEF) and iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XOEFIBIDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.72

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

26.72

XOEF vs. IBID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XOEF vs. IBID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XOEF drawdown since its inception was -7.66%, which is greater than IBID's maximum drawdown of -1.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOEF and IBID.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XOEFIBIDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.66%

-1.28%

-6.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.42%

+0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.27%

-0.23%

-1.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.15%

Volatility

XOEF vs. IBID - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XOEFIBIDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.89%

1.24%

+11.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.89%

2.24%

+10.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.89%

2.24%

+10.65%

XOEF vs. IBID - Expense Ratio Comparison

XOEF has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than IBID's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XOEF vs. IBID - Dividend Comparison

XOEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, less than IBID's 3.68% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
IBID
iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF
3.68%4.43%4.24%0.81%
XOEF
iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF
1.04%0.63%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XOEF and IBID have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IBID is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IBID is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XOEF.

IBID has the higher dividend yield at 3.68%, compared with 1.04% for XOEF.

XOEF is categorized as S&P 500, while IBID is Inflation-Protected Bonds. XOEF tracks S&P 500 Ex-S&P 100 Select Index, while IBID tracks ICE 2027 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XOEF and 0.10% for IBID.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XOEF and IBID

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer