PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XNTK vs. XLE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XNTK vs. XLE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XNTK achieves a 21.38% return, which is significantly lower than XLE's 35.03% return. Over the past 10 years, XNTK has outperformed XLE with an annualized return of 23.46%, while XLE has yielded a comparatively lower 10.52% annualized return.


XNTK

1D
0.32%
1M
-7.35%
6M
19.74%
YTD
21.38%
1Y
45.94%
3Y*
31.93%
5Y*
16.77%
10Y*
23.46%
ALL TIME*
11.11%

XLE

1D
1.00%
1M
11.89%
6M
18.26%
YTD
35.03%
1Y
43.49%
3Y*
14.62%
5Y*
23.67%
10Y*
10.52%
ALL TIME*
8.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.70B$1.73B$1.97B
$14.59M$14.88M$19.50M

XNTK vs. XLE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XNTK
State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF
21.38%38.06%23.49%70.13%-41.07%17.63%73.91%38.08%-7.13%40.37%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
35.03%7.88%5.56%-0.63%64.32%53.28%-32.67%11.74%-18.22%-0.89%

Correlation

The correlation between XNTK and XLE is -0.13, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2001

0.39

The correlation between XNTK and XLE shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.39 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XNTK vs. XLE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XNTK
XLE

Technology

85.8%

-

Communication Services

7.2%

-

Consumer Cyclical

7.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

100.0%

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

XNTK
85.8%
XLE

-

Communication Services

XNTK
7.2%
XLE

-

Consumer Cyclical

XNTK
7.0%
XLE

-

Basic Materials

XNTK

-

XLE

-

Consumer Defensive

XNTK

-

XLE

-

Energy

XNTK

-

XLE
100.0%

Financial Services

XNTK

-

XLE

-

Healthcare

XNTK

-

XLE

-

Industrials

XNTK

-

XLE

-

Real Estate

XNTK

-

XLE

-

Utilities

XNTK

-

XLE

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XNTK vs. XLE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XNTK
XNTK Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
XNTK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XNTK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
XNTK Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
XNTK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
XNTK Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

XLE
XLE Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
XLE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLE Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
XLE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLE Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XNTK vs. XLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XNTKXLEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.32

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.30

2.74

-0.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.96

7.32

-0.36

XNTK vs. XLE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XNTK Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is comparable to the XLE Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XNTK and XLE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XNTK vs. XLE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XNTK drawdown since its inception was -72.38%, roughly equal to the maximum XLE drawdown of -71.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNTK and XLE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XNTKXLEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.38%

-71.26%

-1.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.65%

-14.98%

-3.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.11%

-20.14%

-7.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.28%

-26.04%

-22.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.28%

-66.81%

+18.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.74%

-4.13%

-9.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.21%

-17.93%

-3.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.15%

5.62%

+0.53%

Volatility

XNTK vs. XLE - Volatility Comparison

State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) has a higher volatility of 11.16% compared to State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) at 5.85%. This indicates that XNTK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XNTKXLEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.16%

5.85%

+5.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.16%

16.71%

+8.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.41%

21.05%

+8.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.01%

25.77%

+3.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.17%

29.57%

-2.40%

XNTK vs. XLE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XNTK has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than XLE's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

XNTK vs. XLE - Dividend Comparison

XNTK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, less than XLE's 2.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.55%3.28%3.36%3.55%3.68%4.21%5.62%6.72%3.54%3.03%2.26%3.39%
XNTK
State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF
0.16%0.23%0.42%0.34%0.85%0.34%0.30%0.61%29.64%1.29%0.81%0.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


XNTK and XLE have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XNTK has higher volatility (11.16%) compared to XLE (5.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XNTK dropped -72.38% vs XLE's -71.26%.

On 10-year performance, XNTK leads with 23.46% vs 10.52% for XLE. On fees, XLE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLE has been the lower-risk option at 5.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XNTK has performed better with a 23.46% return vs 10.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XNTK.

XLE has the higher dividend yield at 2.55%, compared with 0.16% for XNTK.

XNTK is categorized as Technology Equities, while XLE is Energy Equities. XNTK tracks NYSE Technology Index, while XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XNTK and 0.08% for XLE.

XLE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XNTK and XLE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer