PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XNTK vs. TDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XNTK vs. TDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) and ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF (TDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XNTK achieves a 21.38% return, which is significantly higher than TDV's 14.99% return.


XNTK

1D
0.32%
1M
-7.35%
6M
19.74%
YTD
21.38%
1Y
45.94%
3Y*
31.93%
5Y*
16.77%
10Y*
23.46%
ALL TIME*
11.11%

TDV

1D
0.75%
1M
-0.57%
6M
11.45%
YTD
14.99%
1Y
22.50%
3Y*
14.78%
5Y*
11.48%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$551.98K$539.76K$593.04K
$14.59M$14.88M$19.50M

XNTK vs. TDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
XNTK
State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF
21.38%38.06%23.49%70.13%-41.07%17.63%73.91%7.67%
TDV
ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF
14.99%16.05%9.72%27.29%-15.94%28.29%29.00%2.86%

Correlation

The correlation between XNTK and TDV is 0.84, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2019

0.84

The correlation between XNTK and TDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

XNTK vs. TDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XNTK
TDV

Technology

85.8%
90.3%

Communication Services

7.2%

-

Consumer Cyclical

7.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

5.1%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

4.6%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

XNTK
85.8%
TDV
90.3%

Communication Services

XNTK
7.2%
TDV

-

Consumer Cyclical

XNTK
7.0%
TDV

-

Basic Materials

XNTK

-

TDV

-

Consumer Defensive

XNTK

-

TDV

-

Energy

XNTK

-

TDV

-

Financial Services

XNTK

-

TDV
5.1%

Healthcare

XNTK

-

TDV

-

Industrials

XNTK

-

TDV
4.6%

Real Estate

XNTK

-

TDV

-

Utilities

XNTK

-

TDV

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XNTK vs. TDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XNTK
XNTK Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
XNTK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XNTK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
XNTK Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
XNTK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
XNTK Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

TDV
TDV Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
TDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDV Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
TDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDV Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XNTK vs. TDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) and ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF (TDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XNTKTDVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.19

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.30

2.19

+0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.96

5.76

+1.20

XNTK vs. TDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XNTK Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is higher than the TDV Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XNTK and TDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XNTK vs. TDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XNTK drawdown since its inception was -72.38%, which is greater than TDV's maximum drawdown of -32.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNTK and TDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XNTKTDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.38%

-32.78%

-39.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.65%

-9.55%

-9.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.11%

-22.51%

-5.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.28%

-25.11%

-23.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.74%

-6.97%

-6.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.21%

-5.37%

-15.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.15%

3.63%

+2.52%

Volatility

XNTK vs. TDV - Volatility Comparison

State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) has a higher volatility of 11.16% compared to ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF (TDV) at 5.85%. This indicates that XNTK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XNTKTDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.16%

5.85%

+5.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.16%

15.38%

+9.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.41%

19.42%

+9.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.01%

20.83%

+8.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.17%

23.27%

+3.90%

XNTK vs. TDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

XNTK has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than TDV's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

XNTK vs. TDV - Dividend Comparison

XNTK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, less than TDV's 1.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TDV
ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF
1.06%1.09%1.16%1.16%1.67%1.08%1.10%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XNTK
State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF
0.16%0.23%0.42%0.34%0.85%0.34%0.30%0.61%29.64%1.29%0.81%0.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


XNTK and TDV have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XNTK has higher volatility (11.16%) compared to TDV (5.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XNTK dropped -72.38% vs TDV's -32.78%.

On 5-year performance, XNTK leads with 16.77% vs 11.48% for TDV. On fees, XNTK is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, TDV has been the lower-risk option at 5.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, XNTK has performed better with a 16.77% return vs 11.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XNTK is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for TDV.

TDV has the higher dividend yield at 1.06%, compared with 0.16% for XNTK.

XNTK tracks NYSE Technology Index, while TDV tracks S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XNTK and 0.45% for TDV.

XNTK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XNTK and TDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer