XNTK vs. SPYM
XNTK (SPDR NYSE Technology ETF) and SPYM (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XNTK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the NYSE Technology Index, while SPYM is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XNTK returned 25.57%/yr vs 15.57%/yr for SPYM. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XNTK charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for SPYM.
Performance
XNTK vs. SPYM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XNTK achieves a 37.92% return, which is significantly higher than SPYM's 11.36% return. Over the past 10 years, XNTK has outperformed SPYM with an annualized return of 25.57%, while SPYM has yielded a comparatively lower 15.57% annualized return.
XNTK
- 1D
- -1.00%
- 1M
- 18.67%
- YTD
- 37.92%
- 6M
- 36.17%
- 1Y
- 73.92%
- 3Y*
- 42.75%
- 5Y*
- 21.11%
- 10Y*
- 25.57%
SPYM
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 4.60%
- YTD
- 11.36%
- 6M
- 11.25%
- 1Y
- 28.60%
- 3Y*
- 22.67%
- 5Y*
- 13.99%
- 10Y*
- 15.57%
XNTK vs. SPYM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XNTK SPDR NYSE Technology ETF | 37.92% | 38.06% | 23.49% | 70.13% | -41.07% | 17.63% | 73.91% | 38.08% | -7.13% | 40.37% |
SPYM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF | 11.36% | 17.79% | 25.00% | 26.24% | -18.09% | 28.78% | 18.49% | 31.99% | -4.78% | 21.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between XNTK and SPYM is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2005 | 0.76 |
The correlation between XNTK and SPYM shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (all time) to 0.87 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XNTK vs. SPYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XNTK
SPYM
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
XNTK
SPYM
Communication Services
XNTK
SPYM
Consumer Cyclical
XNTK
SPYM
Basic Materials
XNTK
-
SPYM
Consumer Defensive
XNTK
-
SPYM
Energy
XNTK
-
SPYM
Financial Services
XNTK
-
SPYM
Healthcare
XNTK
-
SPYM
Industrials
XNTK
-
SPYM
Real Estate
XNTK
-
SPYM
Utilities
XNTK
-
SPYM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XNTK vs. SPYM — Risk / Return Rank
XNTK
SPYM
XNTK vs. SPYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XNTK | SPYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.44 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.37 | 3.23 | +1.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.56 | 15.02 | -0.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XNTK | SPYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.19 | 2.44 | +0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | 0.84 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.96 | 0.87 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.62 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
XNTK vs. SPYM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XNTK drawdown since its inception was -72.38%, which is greater than SPYM's maximum drawdown of -54.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNTK and SPYM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XNTK | SPYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.38% | -54.46% | -17.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.00% | -8.90% | -8.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.11% | -18.72% | -9.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.28% | -24.48% | -23.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.28% | -33.87% | -14.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.07% | -0.32% | -0.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.30% | -7.15% | -14.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.09% | 1.91% | +3.18% |
Volatility
XNTK vs. SPYM - Volatility Comparison
SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) has a higher volatility of 7.65% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) at 2.78%. This indicates that XNTK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XNTK | SPYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.65% | 2.78% | +4.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.06% | 8.91% | +9.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.31% | 11.79% | +11.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.90% | 16.80% | +11.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.63% | 18.00% | +8.63% |
XNTK vs. SPYM - Expense Ratio Comparison
XNTK has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYM's 0.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
XNTK vs. SPYM - Dividend Comparison
XNTK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than SPYM's 0.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF | 0.99% | 1.13% | 1.28% | 1.44% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.79% | 2.23% | 1.75% | 1.97% | 1.98% |
XNTK SPDR NYSE Technology ETF | 0.17% | 0.23% | 0.42% | 0.34% | 0.85% | 0.34% | 0.30% | 0.61% | 29.64% | 1.29% | 0.81% | 0.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XNTK and SPYM have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XNTK has higher volatility (7.65%) compared to SPYM (2.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XNTK dropped -72.38% vs SPYM's -54.46%.
On 10-year performance, XNTK leads with 25.57% vs 15.57% for SPYM. On fees, SPYM is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, SPYM has been the lower-risk option at 2.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XNTK has performed better with a 25.57% return vs 15.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYM is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XNTK.
SPYM has the higher dividend yield at 0.99%, compared with 0.17% for XNTK.
XNTK is categorized as Technology Equities, while SPYM is S&P 500. XNTK tracks NYSE Technology Index, while SPYM tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XNTK and 0.02% for SPYM.
XNTK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.19 vs 2.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XNTK and SPYM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer