PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XNTK vs. BNO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XNTK vs. BNO

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

XNTK (SPDR NYSE Technology ETF) and BNO (United States Brent Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - XNTK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the NYSE Technology Index, while BNO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Brent Crude Oil. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XNTK returned 25.76%/yr vs 13.38%/yr for BNO. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XNTK charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for BNO.

Performance

XNTK vs. BNO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XNTK achieves a 39.42% return, which is significantly lower than BNO's 86.76% return. Over the past 10 years, XNTK has outperformed BNO with an annualized return of 25.76%, while BNO has yielded a comparatively lower 13.38% annualized return.

XNTK

1D
2.68%
1M
22.48%
YTD
39.42%
6M
38.46%
1Y
78.56%
3Y*
43.30%
5Y*
21.80%
10Y*
25.76%

BNO

1D
0.76%
1M
-7.65%
YTD
86.76%
6M
83.45%
1Y
89.50%
3Y*
27.10%
5Y*
23.77%
10Y*
13.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XNTK vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XNTK
SPDR NYSE Technology ETF		39.42%38.06%23.49%70.13%-41.07%17.63%73.91%38.08%-7.13%40.37%
BNO
United States Brent Oil Fund LP		86.76%-5.44%9.67%-3.43%35.25%62.34%-38.23%36.01%-15.30%15.43%

Correlation

The correlation between XNTK and BNO is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2010

0.20

The correlation between XNTK and BNO shifts across timeframes, from -0.24 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

SPDR NYSE Technology ETF

United States Brent Oil Fund LP

Often compared with XNTK:
XNTK vs. QQQXNTK vs. VGTXNTK vs. IYWXNTK vs. VOOXNTK vs. PNQIXNTK vs. OGIGXNTK vs. XSW
Often compared with BNO:
BNO vs. USOBNO vs. XLEBNO vs. USLBNO vs. BOILBNO vs. UNGBNO vs. UCOBNO vs. XOM

Return for Risk

XNTK vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XNTK
XNTK Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
XNTK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XNTK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
XNTK Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
XNTK Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
XNTK Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
BNO
BNO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
BNO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNO Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
BNO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNO Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XNTK vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XNTKBNODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.39

2.17

+1.22

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.98

2.68

+1.30

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.37

+0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.69

5.39

-0.70

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.66

10.23

+5.43

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XNTK vs. BNO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XNTK Sharpe Ratio is 3.39, which is higher than the BNO Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XNTK and BNO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XNTKBNODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.39

2.17

+1.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.68

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

0.37

+0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.14

+0.31

Drawdowns

XNTK vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XNTK drawdown since its inception was -72.38%, smaller than the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNTK and BNO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XNTKBNODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.38%

-87.06%

+14.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.00%

-17.87%

+0.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.11%

-23.75%

-4.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.28%

-33.70%

-14.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.28%

-75.18%

+26.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-12.04%

+12.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.30%

-40.18%

+18.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.09%

9.43%

-4.34%

Volatility

XNTK vs. BNO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) is 7.52%, while United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) has a volatility of 15.03%. This indicates that XNTK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XNTKBNODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.52%

15.03%

-7.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.05%

36.08%

-18.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.29%

41.56%

-18.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.91%

35.37%

-7.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.64%

36.68%

-10.04%

XNTK vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XNTK has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than BNO's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

XNTK vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison

XNTK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, while BNO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BNO
United States Brent Oil Fund LP		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XNTK
SPDR NYSE Technology ETF		0.16%0.23%0.42%0.34%0.85%0.34%0.30%0.61%29.64%1.29%0.81%0.93%

Frequently Asked Questions

XNTK and BNO have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BNO has higher volatility (15.03%) compared to XNTK (7.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XNTK dropped -72.38% vs BNO's -87.06%.

On 10-year performance, XNTK leads with 25.76% vs 13.38% for BNO. On fees, XNTK is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XNTK has been the lower-risk option at 7.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XNTK has performed better with a 25.76% return vs 13.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XNTK is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BNO.

XNTK has the higher dividend yield at 0.16%, compared with 0.00% for BNO.

XNTK is categorized as Technology Equities, while BNO is Oil & Gas. XNTK tracks NYSE Technology Index, while BNO tracks Front Month Brent Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XNTK and 0.90% for BNO.

XNTK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.39 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XNTK and BNO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer