PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XNTK vs. BIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XNTK vs. BIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XNTK achieves a 37.92% return, which is significantly higher than BIL's 1.49% return. Over the past 10 years, XNTK has outperformed BIL with an annualized return of 25.57%, while BIL has yielded a comparatively lower 2.18% annualized return.


XNTK

1D
-1.00%
1M
18.67%
YTD
37.92%
6M
36.17%
1Y
73.92%
3Y*
42.75%
5Y*
21.11%
10Y*
25.57%

BIL

1D
0.00%
1M
0.27%
YTD
1.49%
6M
1.76%
1Y
3.87%
3Y*
4.64%
5Y*
3.41%
10Y*
2.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XNTK vs. BIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XNTK
SPDR NYSE Technology ETF
37.92%38.06%23.49%70.13%-41.07%17.63%73.91%38.08%-7.13%40.37%
BIL
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
1.49%4.15%5.19%4.94%1.40%-0.10%0.40%2.03%1.74%0.69%

Correlation

The correlation between XNTK and BIL is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2007

-0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XNTK vs. BIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XNTK
XNTK Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
XNTK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XNTK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
XNTK Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
XNTK Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
XNTK Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

BIL
BIL Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
BIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIL Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
BIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XNTK vs. BIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XNTKBILDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-16.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-170.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

87.91

-86.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.37

355.35

-350.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.56

2,817.77

-2,803.22

XNTK vs. BIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XNTK Sharpe Ratio is 3.19, which is lower than the BIL Sharpe Ratio of 19.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XNTK and BIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XNTKBILDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.19

19.71

-16.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

13.15

-12.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

8.51

-7.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

2.78

-2.33

Drawdowns

XNTK vs. BIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XNTK drawdown since its inception was -72.38%, which is greater than BIL's maximum drawdown of -0.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNTK and BIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XNTKBILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.38%

-0.78%

-71.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.00%

-0.01%

-16.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.11%

-0.01%

-28.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.28%

-0.10%

-48.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.28%

-0.21%

-48.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.07%

0.00%

-1.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.30%

-0.26%

-21.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.09%

0.00%

+5.09%

Volatility

XNTK vs. BIL - Volatility Comparison

SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) has a higher volatility of 7.65% compared to SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) at 0.06%. This indicates that XNTK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XNTKBILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.65%

0.06%

+7.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.06%

0.13%

+17.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.31%

0.20%

+23.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.90%

0.26%

+27.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.63%

0.26%

+26.37%

XNTK vs. BIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

XNTK has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than BIL's 0.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

XNTK vs. BIL - Dividend Comparison

XNTK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than BIL's 3.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIL
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
3.86%4.13%5.03%4.92%1.35%0.00%0.30%2.05%1.66%0.68%0.07%0.00%
XNTK
SPDR NYSE Technology ETF
0.17%0.23%0.42%0.34%0.85%0.34%0.30%0.61%29.64%1.29%0.81%0.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


XNTK and BIL have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XNTK has higher volatility (7.65%) compared to BIL (0.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XNTK dropped -72.38% vs BIL's -0.78%.

On 10-year performance, XNTK leads with 25.57% vs 2.18% for BIL. On fees, BIL is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, BIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XNTK has performed better with a 25.57% return vs 2.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BIL is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XNTK.

BIL has the higher dividend yield at 3.86%, compared with 0.17% for XNTK.

XNTK is categorized as Technology Equities, while BIL is Government Bonds. XNTK tracks NYSE Technology Index, while BIL tracks Bloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XNTK and 0.14% for BIL.

BIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (19.71 vs 3.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XNTK and BIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer