PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XNKY.DE vs. XNAS.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XNKY.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (XNKY.DE) and Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAS.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XNKY.DE achieves a 32.35% return, which is significantly higher than XNAS.DE's 20.53% return.


XNKY.DE

1D
-1.43%
1M
7.59%
YTD
32.35%
6M
30.39%
1Y
60.72%
3Y*
20.83%
5Y*
12.43%
10Y*

XNAS.DE

1D
-0.83%
1M
7.97%
YTD
20.53%
6M
18.71%
1Y
37.14%
3Y*
24.64%
5Y*
18.79%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XNKY.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
XNKY.DE
Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF
32.35%16.16%14.34%18.03%-15.35%-0.78%
XNAS.DE
Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C
20.53%7.11%33.75%51.36%-29.99%33.56%

Correlation

The correlation between XNKY.DE and XNAS.DE is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2021

0.61

The correlation between XNKY.DE and XNAS.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XNKY.DE vs. XNAS.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XNKY.DE
XNKY.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
XNKY.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XNKY.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
XNKY.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
XNKY.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
XNKY.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

XNAS.DE
XNAS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
XNAS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XNAS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
XNAS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
XNAS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
XNAS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XNKY.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (XNKY.DE) and Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XNKY.DEXNAS.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.42

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.59

3.77

+0.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.91

11.16

+2.75

XNKY.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XNKY.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is comparable to the XNAS.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XNKY.DE and XNAS.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XNKY.DEXNAS.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.53

2.40

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.93

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.91

-0.16

Drawdowns

XNKY.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XNKY.DE drawdown since its inception was -21.47%, smaller than the maximum XNAS.DE drawdown of -31.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNKY.DE and XNAS.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XNKY.DEXNAS.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.47%

-31.25%

+9.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.99%

-10.00%

-2.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.16%

-26.72%

+6.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.15%

-31.25%

+10.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.43%

-0.83%

-0.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.84%

-7.83%

-0.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.29%

3.38%

+0.91%

Volatility

XNKY.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (XNKY.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.59% compared to Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAS.DE) at 4.31%. This indicates that XNKY.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XNAS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XNKY.DEXNAS.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.59%

4.31%

+2.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.61%

10.91%

+7.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.59%

15.71%

+7.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.57%

19.88%

-1.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.42%

19.84%

-1.42%

XNKY.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XNKY.DE has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than XNAS.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XNKY.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XNKY.DE nor XNAS.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XNKY.DE and XNAS.DE have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XNKY.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XNKY.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XNAS.DE.

XNKY.DE is categorized as Japan Equities, while XNAS.DE is Nasdaq-100. XNKY.DE tracks Nikkei 225®, while XNAS.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for XNKY.DE and 0.20% for XNAS.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XNKY.DE and XNAS.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer