XNGI.DE vs. FLCH
XNGI.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Next Generation Internet Innovation UCITS ETF 1C) and FLCH (Franklin FTSE China ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XNGI.DE is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI IMI Next Generation Internet Innovation Select ESG Screened 100, while FLCH is a China Equities fund tracking the FTSE China RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XNGI.DE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for FLCH.
Performance
XNGI.DE vs. FLCH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XNGI.DE is traded in EUR, while FLCH is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FLCH values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XNGI.DE achieves a 13.67% return, which is significantly higher than FLCH's -11.51% return.
XNGI.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -2.05%
- YTD
- 13.67%
- 6M
- 13.86%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLCH
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- -4.87%
- YTD
- -11.51%
- 6M
- -13.07%
- 1Y
- -1.78%
- 3Y*
- 5.98%
- 5Y*
- -5.78%
- 10Y*
- —
XNGI.DE vs. FLCH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XNGI.DE Xtrackers MSCI Next Generation Internet Innovation UCITS ETF 1C | 13.67% | 4.64% |
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF | -11.51% | 4.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between XNGI.DE and FLCH is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 11, 2025 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XNGI.DE vs. FLCH — Risk / Return Rank
XNGI.DE
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FLCH
XNGI.DE vs. FLCH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Next Generation Internet Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XNGI.DE) and Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XNGI.DE | FLCH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.99 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.12 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -0.29 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XNGI.DE vs. FLCH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XNGI.DE drawdown since its inception was -18.97%, smaller than the maximum FLCH drawdown of -55.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNGI.DE and FLCH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XNGI.DE | FLCH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.97% | -55.61% | +36.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -19.16% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -24.49% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -48.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.05% | -36.06% | +31.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.89% | -25.81% | +19.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 8.17% | — |
Volatility
XNGI.DE vs. FLCH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XNGI.DE | FLCH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.12% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.21% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.56% | 18.76% | +0.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.56% | 28.32% | -8.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.56% | 27.03% | -7.47% |
XNGI.DE vs. FLCH - Expense Ratio Comparison
XNGI.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than FLCH's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
XNGI.DE vs. FLCH - Dividend Comparison
XNGI.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FLCH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.52%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF | 2.52% | 2.36% | 2.87% | 3.47% | 2.69% | 1.48% | 0.91% | 1.98% | 1.92% | 0.01% |
XNGI.DE Xtrackers MSCI Next Generation Internet Innovation UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XNGI.DE and FLCH have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLCH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLCH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for XNGI.DE.
XNGI.DE is categorized as Technology Equities, while FLCH is China Equities. XNGI.DE tracks MSCI ACWI IMI Next Generation Internet Innovation Select ESG Screened 100, while FLCH tracks FTSE China RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for XNGI.DE and 0.19% for FLCH.
Find the right allocation for XNGI.DE and FLCH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer