XNAV vs. GRW

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

XNAV (FundX Aggressive ETF) and GRW (TCW Durable Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -1.00, they often move in opposite directions. XNAV charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GRW.

Performance

XNAV vs. GRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FundX Aggressive ETF (XNAV) and TCW Durable Growth ETF (GRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

XNAV

• 1D: 1.49%
• 1M: 8.49%
• YTD: 24.50%
• 6M: 26.25%
• 1Y: 45.35%
• 3Y*: 25.53%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GRW

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XNAV vs. GRW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
XNAV FundX Aggressive ETF	1.54%
GRW TCW Durable Growth ETF	1.61%

Correlation

The correlation between XNAV and GRW is -1.00, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026	-1.00

XNAV vs. GRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XNAV	GRW
Technology	33.3%	26.6%
Industrials	10.8%	38.1%
Financial Services	10.2%	9.8%
Basic Materials	9.4%	4.0%
Energy	8.0%	-
Consumer Cyclical	7.8%	8.3%
Communication Services	7.0%	9.1%
Consumer Defensive	5.0%	-
Healthcare	4.2%	4.1%
Utilities	3.3%	-
Real Estate	1.1%	-

Return for Risk

XNAV vs. GRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XNAV

XNAV Risk / Return Rank: 80
XNAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
XNAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
XNAV Omega Ratio Rank: 79
XNAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
XNAV Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XNAV vs. GRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FundX Aggressive ETF (XNAV) and TCW Durable Growth ETF (GRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XNAV	GRW	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.76	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.57	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.05	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	17.04	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XNAV	GRW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.76	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.31	37.56	-36.25

Drawdowns

XNAV vs. GRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XNAV drawdown since its inception was -24.27%, which is greater than GRW's maximum drawdown of -0.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNAV and GRW.

Drawdown Indicators

	XNAV	GRW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.27%	-0.13%	-24.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.47%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.27%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.13%	+0.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.59%	-0.04%	-3.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.73%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XNAV	GRW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.45%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.67%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.55%	9.26%	+7.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.74%	9.26%	+9.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.74%	9.26%	+9.48%

XNAV vs. GRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

XNAV has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than GRW's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

XNAV vs. GRW - Dividend Comparison

XNAV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, while GRW has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
GRW TCW Durable Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XNAV FundX Aggressive ETF	0.47%	0.58%	0.09%	1.21%	1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XNAV and GRW in my portfolio?

XNAV and GRW have a correlation of -1.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XNAV or GRW?

On fees, GRW is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XNAV or GRW?

GRW is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for XNAV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XNAV or GRW?

XNAV has the higher dividend yield at 0.47%, compared with 0.00% for GRW.

What is the main difference between XNAV and GRW?

They also come from different issuers: FundX and TCW. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for XNAV and 0.75% for GRW.